ARTICLE
6 December 2013

Sentencing Guidelines For Insider Trading: Recent Amendments Create Greater Disparity

RG
Ropes & Gray LLP

Contributor

Ropes & Gray is a preeminent global law firm with approximately 1,400 lawyers and legal professionals serving clients in major centers of business, finance, technology and government. The firm has offices in New York, Washington, D.C., Boston, Chicago, San Francisco, Silicon Valley, London, Hong Kong, Shanghai, Tokyo and Seoul.
When it passed the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, Congress created the United States Sentencing Commission and envisioned that it would issue sentencing guidelines designed to ‘‘avoid[] unwarranted sentencing disparities.’
United States Criminal Law

Government enforcement partner Christopher Conniff, government enforcement counsel Steven Goldschmidt and litigation associate Helen Gugel recently authored an article in the Oct. 2013 issue of the Federal Sentencing Reporter, published by the University of California Press. In the article, titled "Sentencing Guidelines for Insider Trading: Recent Amendments Create Greater Disparity," the authors provide an overview of the amended insider trading guidelines and discuss the impact that these changes will have on sentencing. The authors also review the application of these amended guidelines in recent, prominent white-collar cases.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More