ARTICLE
14 January 2021

Judiciary Responds To Cybersecurity Breach: New Procedure Enacted To Safeguard Highly Sensitive Documents

VK
Volpe Koenig

Contributor

Volpe Koenig provides worldwide client counseling on patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets, technology transfers, due diligence, licensing and enforcement of intellectual property rights. The firm’s attorneys, agents and technical advisors have expertise in a wide range of industries and serve a diverse roster of U.S. and multinational clients.
The Administrative Office of the United States Courts announced new security procedures to protect confidential filings on Wednesday, January 6, 2021.
United States Technology
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The Administrative Office of the United States Courts announced new security procedures to protect confidential filings on Wednesday, January 6, 2021. The changes come in the wake of a massive cybersecurity breach identified in December 2020. The breach involved a known compromise of third-party provider products, and has affected a number of federal agencies, including the Departments of Energy, Commerce, State, and Treasury. The Judiciary uses an impacted product for IT network monitoring and management and; consequently, its online filing system has been jeopardized.

In response to an emergency directive from the Department of Homeland Security, the Judiciary has suspended all national and local use of the Case Management/Electronic Case Files System (“CM/ECF”) with respect to highly sensitive documents (“HSDs”). Under the new procedure, HSDs filed in federal court will be accepted for filing only in paper form or via a secure electronic device, such as a USB stick or thumb drive, and these will be stored in a secure, stand-alone computer system. Such documents will not be uploaded to CM/ECF. The Judiciary noted that this does not affect the policy regarding public access to court records, and PACER will remain online.

Since the Judiciary's announcement, courts have issued and will continue to issue standing and general orders regarding the new procedures for this sensitive material. Courts will offer guidance on what types of filings are considered to contain HSDs. The Judiciary noted “most documents similar to and including presentence reports, pretrial release reports, pleadings related to cooperation in most criminal cases, Social Security records, administrative immigration records, and sealed filings in many civil cases likely would not be sufficiently sensitive to require HSD treatment.” These types of filings could likely continue to be sealed in CM/ECF as necessary.

As the fallout from the breach continues, expect to encounter changing security measures across all courts and software platforms in the coming months. It is critical that all litigants and potential litigants stay current on privacy and cybersecurity news and always use best practices in keeping documents as safe and secure as possible, particularly with court filings.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

ARTICLE
14 January 2021

Judiciary Responds To Cybersecurity Breach: New Procedure Enacted To Safeguard Highly Sensitive Documents

United States Technology

Contributor

Volpe Koenig provides worldwide client counseling on patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets, technology transfers, due diligence, licensing and enforcement of intellectual property rights. The firm’s attorneys, agents and technical advisors have expertise in a wide range of industries and serve a diverse roster of U.S. and multinational clients.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More