ARTICLE
13 February 2012

Solar Still Makes Fiscal, Environmental Sense

AG
Archer & Greiner P.C.

Contributor

Archer & Greiner is now Archer. But what matters most is what remains the same. Our new name still represents an unwavering commitment to delivering large-firm expertise with small-firm attention—no matter the size of the client. It’s a philosophy that’s helped us grow into one of the largest and most trusted law firms in the Mid-Atlantic region, serving businesses and individuals throughout the region and in a growing number of other states and jurisdictions. With a network of regional offices from Delaware to New York, Archer has more than 175 lawyers practicing in all major legal disciplines including corporate, labor, commercial litigation, family, real estate and many more.
You may have read or heard lately that solar panel installation may not be cost-effective for businesses.
United States Energy and Natural Resources
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Reprinted from the Jan. 2, 2012, edition of The Review, the Newsletter of the Chamber of Commerce of Southern New Jersey.

You may have read or heard lately that solar panel installation may not be cost-effective for businesses. For those who want to help the environment and save money on energy costs, solar can still be a good investment, if your approach is for long-term benefits and not a shortterm return on investment.

Over the past several years, business owners were able to install solar panels with the enticement of a full return on their investment in under three years. This was due to very high prices for SRECs – Solar Renewable Energy Certificates – purchased mainly by electric utilities to meet New Jersey's aggressive alternative energy requirements, coupled with a federal grant that provided a cash grant for up to 30% of installation costs. These incentives caused a massive influx of solar installations in New Jersey, driving SREC prices down from a high of $650 to a current value of approximately $200. Still, solar installation, coupled with energy conservation activities, remains an excellent way to aid the environment and provide energy savings.

Under current SREC market conditions, most solar installations will pay for themselves in seven to 10 years. The federal grant providing cash for 30% of the qualified energy facility costs, known as the 1603 Grant, expired at the end of 2011, but 30% tax credits will continue until 2016. In addition, bonus depreciation up to 50% of the qualified energy facility cost can be taken by qualified taxpayers who have systems installed and operational before October 2012. With current incentives, solar facility owners can expect to enjoy the benefits for up to 20 years, while paying little or nothing for the electricity produced and receiving SREC income for the first 15 years.

A business or property owner who doesn't want to use their own credit to purchase the solar facility can enter into a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) with a power provider, where the property owner receives the electricity but does not own the system. These transactions involve additional complexities, so it would be wise to consult with an attorney to avoid pitfalls.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More