ARTICLE
11 April 2013

Yet Another Zip Code Class Action Filed In Massachusetts

M
Mintz

Contributor

Mintz is a general practice, full-service Am Law 100 law firm with more than 600 attorneys. We are headquartered in Boston and have additional US offices in Los Angeles, Miami, New York City, San Diego, San Francisco, and Washington, DC, as well as an office in Toronto, Canada.
A discussion on the findings of the privacy case against craft giant Michaels Stores.
United States Privacy
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Earlier this month, we reported on the privacy case against craft giant Michaels Stores (see our blog post here, as well as our client alert here) in which the plaintiff alleged that Michaels illegally collected zip codes during credit card transactions. The case was ultimately dismissed by the federal district court, but questions of law were sent to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ("SJC"), including whether zip codes are "personal identification information" under Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 93 § 105. In the Michaels case, the SJC held that zip codes are personal identification information under the consumer protection law relating to credit card transactions.

Another important question sent to the SJC through the Michaels case was whether legal action could be brought under the statute where there was no evidence of identity fraud. The SJC found that a case can be brought even if there is no evidence of identity fraud, as the statute is intended to "address invasion of consumer privacy by merchants..." The SJC listed two specific harms that constitute an injury under the statute:

  1. the actual receipt by a consumer of unwanted marketing materials as a result of the merchant's unlawful collection of consumer personal identification information; and
  2. the merchant's sale of a consumer's personal identification information to a third party.

Both of these injuries are alleged in in two putative class action complaints against defendant Bed Bath & Beyond ("BBB"). One complaint recently filed by the same plaintiff in the Michaels case, and another filed by by plaintiff Kelley Whiting. Both complaints were filed in federal district court and allege that BBB violates customers' privacy by collecting zip codes during credit card transactions. The complaints assert that BBB does not ask customers for their zip codes because the credit company requires the information or for verification purposes, but rather for "its own business purpose." The purpose? The complaints allege that BBB (a) uses that information to identify the customer's address and/or telephone number, which it locates using commercially available databases, (b) uses the enhanced information for its own direct marketing (i.e. junk mail) and/or (c) sells the information to third parties.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

ARTICLE
11 April 2013

Yet Another Zip Code Class Action Filed In Massachusetts

United States Privacy

Contributor

Mintz is a general practice, full-service Am Law 100 law firm with more than 600 attorneys. We are headquartered in Boston and have additional US offices in Los Angeles, Miami, New York City, San Diego, San Francisco, and Washington, DC, as well as an office in Toronto, Canada.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More