ARTICLE
19 December 2007

Wisconsin Legislature Considering Significant Changes To Property Tax Assessment Objection Procedure And Judicial Review

FL
Foley & Lardner

Contributor

Foley & Lardner LLP looks beyond the law to focus on the constantly evolving demands facing our clients and their industries. With over 1,100 lawyers in 24 offices across the United States, Mexico, Europe and Asia, Foley approaches client service by first understanding our clients’ priorities, objectives and challenges. We work hard to understand our clients’ issues and forge long-term relationships with them to help achieve successful outcomes and solve their legal issues through practical business advice and cutting-edge legal insight. Our clients view us as trusted business advisors because we understand that great legal service is only valuable if it is relevant, practical and beneficial to their businesses.
On Wednesday December 5, 2007 at 10:00 a.m., the Wisconsin State Senate Committee on Tax Fairness Family Prosperity will hold a hearing on proposed changes to the current procedure for taxpayer challenges to property tax assessments that would significantly curtail a taxpayer's ability to challenge an assessment.
United States Tax
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On Wednesday December 5, 2007 at 10:00 a.m., the Wisconsin State Senate Committee on Tax Fairness & Family Prosperity will hold a hearing on proposed changes to the current procedure for taxpayer challenges to property tax assessments that would significantly curtail a taxpayer's ability to challenge an assessment. The hearing will be held in the State Capitol Building, Room 411 South.

Currently, Wisconsin taxpayers other than manufacturers (who are assessed by the State Department of Revenue) have two principal avenues available to challenge a local property tax assessment — the objection and certiorari review procedure under Section 70.47, Wis. Stats., or a claim for recovery of an excessive assessment under Section 74.37, Wis. Stats. Both avenues require the taxpayer to first file an objection to the assessment and participate in a hearing before the local board of review. Court review of the board's determination under the Section 70.47 certiorari review procedure is limited to a review of the record evidence presented before the board, with the court giving the decision of the board substantial deference. Review under Section 74.37, on the other hand, permits a taxpayer to challenge the assessment anew on any grounds in a refund action filed in circuit court, regardless of the evidence previously submitted to the board. Under the refund procedure, the court is not required to give the board of review's prior decision any deference. From a taxpayer's perspective, bringing an excessive assessment claim followed by a refund action under Section 74.37 may have significant advantages over seeking certiorari review of a board of review's determination under Section 70.47 where, for example, the taxpayer did not have the opportunity to obtain a certified appraisal or compile other evidence prior to the board of review hearing, or where the valuation and other issues are beyond the board's expertise.

2007 Senate Bill 329 and its counterpart, 2007 Assembly Bill 580, would amend these procedures by effectively eliminating the opportunity to file a refund action on a claim for excessive assessment so long as the municipality enacted an ordinance adopting certain minimum protections designed to make the board of review hearing more meaningful.

Specifically, the proposed legislation would:

  • Permit local taxation districts to pass an ordinance allowing a taxpayer to obtain a 60-day extension prior to a hearing on an objection to permit more time to collect evidence and prepare its "case." Currently, boards of review need only give the taxpayer 48 hours advance notice of a hearing once an objection has been filed.
  • Require the taxpayer and the local assessor to present all evidence (as outlined in the Property Assessment Manual for Wisconsin Assessors) supporting their positions on the assessment. If the taxpayer takes advantage of the 60-day extension, the taxpayer and the assessor must simultaneously exchange all reports, documents, and exhibits either intends to use at the hearing on the objection at least 10 days prior to the hearing.
  • Require boards of review to allow "a reasonable amount of time for a hearing" on an objection to an assessment.
  • Permit a court on certiorari review of a board's decision under Section 70.47 to consider new evidence outside the record before the board where the evidence was not available at the time of the hearing before the board or where the board refused to consider the evidence.
  • Permit a court on certiorari review to determine the correct amount of the assessment where the taxpayer rebuts the presumption of correctness afforded to the assessment with "a sufficient showing," rather than requiring the objection to be remanded to the board of review for redetermination of the assessment.
  • Eliminate the de novo court review available to a taxpayer under a Section 74.37 excessive assessment claim if the taxation district enacts a 60-day extension ordinance, regardless of whether the taxpayer took advantage of the extension.

The impact of this legislation, if passed, would be to expand the ability of a taxpayer to challenge a board of review's determination on an assessment in court under the certiorari procedures of Section 70.47, Wis. Stats., while at the same time effectively eliminating the taxpayer's current ability to have a court or jury determine the appropriate assessment after presentation of any and all relevant evidence and full trial, without deference to the local board of review. The net effect of these amendments is to reduce a taxpayer's ability to challenge local property tax assessments.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

ARTICLE
19 December 2007

Wisconsin Legislature Considering Significant Changes To Property Tax Assessment Objection Procedure And Judicial Review

United States Tax

Contributor

Foley & Lardner LLP looks beyond the law to focus on the constantly evolving demands facing our clients and their industries. With over 1,100 lawyers in 24 offices across the United States, Mexico, Europe and Asia, Foley approaches client service by first understanding our clients’ priorities, objectives and challenges. We work hard to understand our clients’ issues and forge long-term relationships with them to help achieve successful outcomes and solve their legal issues through practical business advice and cutting-edge legal insight. Our clients view us as trusted business advisors because we understand that great legal service is only valuable if it is relevant, practical and beneficial to their businesses.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More