Senate Health Care Reform Policy Options: Fraud And Abuse

MW
McDermott Will & Emery

Contributor

McDermott Will & Emery logo
McDermott Will & Emery partners with leaders around the world to fuel missions, knock down barriers and shape markets. With more than 1,100 lawyers across several office locations worldwide, our team works seamlessly across practices, industries and geographies to deliver highly effective solutions that propel success.
On April 29, 2009, the Senate Finance Committee released the first of three anticipated health reform option papers.
United States Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The Facts

On April 29, 2009, the Senate Finance Committee released the first of three anticipated health reform option papers. The proposals under consideration would make significant fraud and abuse changes encourage transparency and program integrity. Comments must be submitted to the Committee by May 15, 2009.

Transparency

The proposal would impose new transparency obligations on physicians, hospitals, nursing homes and pharmaceutical manufacturers. Transparency proposals include the following:

Amend the Stark Law in-office ancillary services exception to require physicians to disclose financial interests in certain imaging services

Eliminate the Stark Law "whole hospital" and rural provider exceptions with limited grandfather provisions to preclude physicians from self-referring to hospitals

Require pharmaceutical and medical device manufacturers to disclose financial relationships with physicians

Require nursing homes to disclose ownership information, implement compliance programs for their employees and report staffing data

Program Integrity

The Committee proposes to strengthen compliance requirements and enforcement activity by taking the following action:

Increasing funding to federal enforcement programs

Strengthening the screening process for Medicare program provider applications, which may include criminal background and licensure checks and unannounced site visits

Requiring providers to implement compliance programs as a condition of participation in Medicare and Medicaid

Amending the Civil Monetary Penalties (CMPs) Law to increase penalties and extend the use of CMPs for certain violations

What's at Stake

The federal government may increase enforcement activities bolstered by easier access to publicly available information on existing arrangements and relationships.

Providers could face increased penalties or suspension of payment for compliance failures.

What You Should Do

Consider submission of comments to the Committee. Comments can be submitted through May 15, 2009.

Assess and audit current approaches to management of financial relationships, and closely evaluate the implications of publicly disclosing the details of these relationships.

Evaluate the additional investment of time and resources to meet the proposed transparency requirements.

Review and update compliance plans.

Continually evaluate ongoing business decisions in light of the direction and quick pace health reform is taking.

If you have questions or want to discuss submission of comments to the report, contact your regular McDermott lawyer or any of the contacts listed to the right.

Click here to view the entire policy paper.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More