Insufficient Protection Of PHI Leads To HIPAA Settlement

TC
Thompson Coburn LLP

Contributor

For almost 90 years, Thompson Coburn LLP has provided the quality legal services and counsel our clients demand to achieve their most critical business goals. With more than 380 lawyers and 40 practice areas, we serve clients throughout the United States and beyond.
OCR opened its investigation of SEMC's HIPAA compliance practices after receiving a complaint on November 16, 2012 alleging that SEMC violated HIPAA...
United States Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The latest settlement between the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights ("OCR") and St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, a tertiary care Massachusetts hospital ("SEMC"), is a reminder that having a strong and functioning HIPAA compliance program is imperative for organizations subject to HIPAA.

OCR opened its investigation of SEMC's HIPAA compliance practices after receiving a complaint on November 16, 2012 alleging that SEMC violated HIPAA and that its workforce members used an internet-based document sharing application to store documents containing electronic protected health information ("PHI").  Subsequently, on August 25, 2014, SEMC notified OCR of a breach of unsecured PHI affecting 595 individuals related to storing PHI on a former SEMC workforce member's personal laptop and USB flash drive.  The OCR's investigation of these matters found that SEMC failed to implement sufficient security measures regarding the transmission and storage of PHI to reduce risks and vulnerabilities to a reasonable level, did not timely identify and respond to a known security incident and improperly disclosed PHI of at least 1093 individuals. On July 8, 2015, SEMC entered into a resolution agreement with the OCR to resolve these matters.

The $218,400 settlement amount under the resolution agreement took into consideration the circumstances of the complaint and breach, the size of the entity and types of PHI disclosed. In addition to paying the settlement, the resolution agreement requires SEMC to adopt a robust corrective action plan to address HIPAA compliance. Under the corrective action plan, SEMC must assess its workforce members' familiarity and compliance with SEMC policies and procedures addressing:

  • transmitting PHI using unauthorized networks,
  • storing PHI on unauthorized information systems, including unsecured networks and devices,
  • removal of PHI from SEMC,
  • prohibition on sharing accounts and passwords for PHI access or storage,
  • encryption of portable devices that access or store PHI, and
  • reporting security incidents.

In addition, the corrective action plan also requires SEMC to appropriately strengthen its HIPAA policies and procedures, revise its HIPAA training and timely investigate and report to the OCR noncompliance with its HIPAA policies and procedures by workforce members.

In connection with this settlement, OCR highlighted the importance of following HIPAA requirements when using internet based document sharing applications and emphasized that to reduce potential risks and vulnerabilities to PHI, workforce must follow HIPAA policies and that security incidents must be reported and mitigated in a timely manner.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Insufficient Protection Of PHI Leads To HIPAA Settlement

United States Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences

Contributor

For almost 90 years, Thompson Coburn LLP has provided the quality legal services and counsel our clients demand to achieve their most critical business goals. With more than 380 lawyers and 40 practice areas, we serve clients throughout the United States and beyond.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More