ARTICLE
16 December 2015

Confidentiality Policies Cannot Prohibit Employees From Disclosing Contractor Fraud, Waste, And Abuse

MF
Morrison & Foerster LLP
Contributor
Known for providing cutting-edge legal advice on matters that are redefining industries, Morrison & Foerster has 17 offices located in the United States, Asia, and Europe. Our clients include Fortune 100 companies, leading tech and life sciences companies, and some of the largest financial institutions. We also represent investment funds and startups.
A contractor's failure to comply with these provisions could make it ineligible to receive any contract funded by fiscal year 2015 and 2016 appropriations.
United States Government, Public Sector
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The Department of Defense (DoD) has amended the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to make clear that contractors cannot require their employees or subcontractors to sign confidentiality agreements that would restrict the employees or subcontractors from reporting fraud, waste, or abuse, or cooperating with law enforcement investigations of such allegations. Under the new regulation, contractors must notify their employees and subcontractors that any such prior restrictions are invalid. Moreover, in submitting an offer for a solicitation with a DoD agency, prospective contractors must represent that they do not require their employees or contractors to sign or comply with a prohibited confidentiality agreement. A contractor's failure to comply with these provisions could make it ineligible to receive any contract funded by fiscal year 2015 and 2016 appropriations.

Contractors should review and revise their employee confidentiality agreements and policies to remove any language that could be construed as restricting an employee's ability to report fraud, waste, or abuse to the government. In addition, contractors should notify their employees that the prohibitions and restrictions of any internal confidentiality agreements covered by this new rule are no longer valid.

The new implementing DFARS clauses are 252.203-7996, Prohibition on Contracting with Entities that Require Certain Internal Confidentiality Agreements—Representation; and 252.203-7997, Prohibition on Contracting with Entities that Require Certain Internal Confidentiality Agreements. The clauses will be included in all new solicitations and contracts, including those involving commercial items. Contracting officers also must modify existing contracts awarded on or after October 1, 2015 to include this prohibition.

The new DFARS provisions and implementing memorandum are available here: http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/policy/policyvault/USA005618-15-DPAP.pdf.

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

ARTICLE
16 December 2015

Confidentiality Policies Cannot Prohibit Employees From Disclosing Contractor Fraud, Waste, And Abuse

United States Government, Public Sector
Contributor
Known for providing cutting-edge legal advice on matters that are redefining industries, Morrison & Foerster has 17 offices located in the United States, Asia, and Europe. Our clients include Fortune 100 companies, leading tech and life sciences companies, and some of the largest financial institutions. We also represent investment funds and startups.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More