California Justices Back Class Action Waiver But Decide A PAGA Claim Is Not Preempted

David F. Faustman was mentioned in an article, "California Justices Back Class Action Waiver But Decide a PAGA Claim Is Not Preempted."
United States Employment and HR
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

David F. Faustman was mentioned in an article, "California Justices Back Class Action Waiver But Decide a PAGA Claim Is Not Preempted." The full article is available ni the June 24, 2014 issue of Bloomberg BNA, but a synopsis is provided below.

On June 23rd, the California Supreme Court's previous decision to enforce class action waivers on the grounds of public policy were repealed by the U.S. Supreme Court's decisions regarding the Federal Arbitration Act.

David F. Faustman, who represented CLS Transportation, commented that the court's ruling was a "clear victory" for the employer. He continues to say that the decision is still in review on Iskanian's PAGA claim. It is still uncertain if there is a "principled difference" between this claim and a class action claim, which the court determined was averted by the FAA.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

California Justices Back Class Action Waiver But Decide A PAGA Claim Is Not Preempted

United States Employment and HR
Contributor
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More