ARTICLE
15 March 2024

Court Finds Corporate Transparency Act Unconstitutional – What Should You Do?

SS
Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Contributor

With more than 900 lawyers across 18 offices, Seyfarth Shaw LLP provides advisory, litigation, and transactional legal services to clients worldwide. Our high-caliber legal representation and advanced delivery capabilities allow us to take on our clients’ unique challenges and opportunities-no matter the scale or complexity. Whether navigating complex litigation, negotiating transformational deals, or advising on cross-border projects, our attorneys achieve exceptional legal outcomes. Our drive for excellence leads us to seek out better ways to work with our clients and each other. We have been first-to-market on many legal service delivery innovations-and we continue to break new ground with our clients every day. This long history of excellence and innovation has created a culture with a sense of purpose and belonging for all. In turn, our culture drives our commitment to the growth of our clients, the diversity of our people, and the resilience of our workforce.
On March 1, 2024, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, in the case of National Small Business United v. Yellen, declared that the Corporate Transparency Act...
United States Corporate/Commercial Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On March 1, 2024, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, in the case of National Small Business United v. Yellen, declared that the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) is unconstitutional. Although FinCEN announced that it will comply with the Court's order for as long as it remains in effect and that the government is not currentlyenforcing the CTA against the plaintiffs in the case (including members of the National Small Business Association), it is likely that either (i) the decision will be appealed by the government and that pending the appeal the decision will be stayed, or (ii) FinCEN will propose amendments to the CTA, which if adopted will address and seek to cure the constitutional issues. Pending any such appeal and stay or amendment, what should you do?

  1. With respect to entities that were in existence on January 1, 2024 and therefore not required to file a beneficial ownership report until the end of this year, continue to gather information required to be disclosed, but delay the filing of the report until later this year when hopefully more information will be available on the effect of the decision. It should be noted that we have generally advised entities falling in this category to, in any event, similarly delay filing their reports with the hope that as the year progresses FinCEN issues further clarifications of the CTA.
  2. With respect to entities formed this year, in which case they have 90 days from the date of formation to file their beneficial ownership report, continue to gather information required to be disclosed but delay the filing of the report until the end of the applicable 90 day or if earlier, until further clarifying information is available.
  3. With respect to entities that are members of the National Small Business Association, regardless of when formed, FinCEN's initial response, like many aspects of the CTA, is less than entirely clear and does not offer specific guidance as to whether or when in the future it will seek to enforce the CTA. Therefore, despite FinCEN's announcement that it is not currently enforcing the CTA, the best practice would be to follow recommendation 1 or 2 above, as applicable.

If you have questions concerning the effect of the decision in National Small Business United v. Yellen or the CTA in general, please do not hesitate to contact Seyfarth's Corporate Transparency Act Task Force.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

ARTICLE
15 March 2024

Court Finds Corporate Transparency Act Unconstitutional – What Should You Do?

United States Corporate/Commercial Law

Contributor

With more than 900 lawyers across 18 offices, Seyfarth Shaw LLP provides advisory, litigation, and transactional legal services to clients worldwide. Our high-caliber legal representation and advanced delivery capabilities allow us to take on our clients’ unique challenges and opportunities-no matter the scale or complexity. Whether navigating complex litigation, negotiating transformational deals, or advising on cross-border projects, our attorneys achieve exceptional legal outcomes. Our drive for excellence leads us to seek out better ways to work with our clients and each other. We have been first-to-market on many legal service delivery innovations-and we continue to break new ground with our clients every day. This long history of excellence and innovation has created a culture with a sense of purpose and belonging for all. In turn, our culture drives our commitment to the growth of our clients, the diversity of our people, and the resilience of our workforce.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More