ARTICLE
3 March 2010

Lord Justice Jackson's Costs Review: Key Points From The Final Report

CC
CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang

Contributor

CMS is a Future Facing firm with 79 offices in over 40 countries and more than 5,000 lawyers globally. Combining local market insight with a global perspective, CMS provides business-focused advice to help clients navigate change confidently. The firm's expertise and innovative approach anticipate challenges and develop solutions. CMS is committed to diversity, inclusivity, and corporate social responsibility, fostering a supportive culture. The firm addresses key client concerns like efficiency and regulatory challenges through services like Law-Now, offering real-time eAlerts, mobile access, an extensive legal archive, specialist zones, and global events.

Lord Justice Jackson’s Final Report on civil litigation costs was published a little over a month ago.
United Kingdom Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Lord Justice Jackson's Final Report on civil litigation costs (http://tinyurl.com/yg9g8bg) was published a little over a month ago. Since its publication there has been a huge amount of debate on his recommendations, especially on the key planks of his reforms which propose a radical overhaul of the current "no win / no fee" regime.

What are the key points arising out of the Final Report? Please click here (http://tinyurl.com/ylmzub6) to view the document where we provide a summary of the important recommendations made. The major recommendations affect personal injuries litigation, and similar types of case, where "no win / no fee" agreements are common. There are, however, other important recommendations that would impact on commercial litigation.

What is likely to happen with Lord Justice Jackson's recommendations? The government has said that it is giving detailed consideration to Lord Justice Jackson's report, without giving much away on what it is likely to do. In a recent session of Question Time:

  • Jack Straw MP (Labour), the Secretary of State for Justice and the Lord Chancellor, said that the Final Report "is remarkable for its thoroughness and imagination", going on to say "we are now actively assessing the implications of Sir Rupert's proposals, including - crucially - their economic impact".
  • Henry Bellingham MP (Conservative), said "We, too, welcome this remarkable magnum opus".
  • Another Conservative MP said "I have read every word of the report!", to which Jack Straw responded "There will be an examination straight after this!" If you, too, would like to read every word of the Final Report, or even just parts of it, the report can be downloaded here (http://tinyurl.com/yzu39cd ).

Recently in the House of Lords, Lord Woolf himself asked Lord Bach (the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Ministry of Justice) how long he anticipated the government's initial consideration of the Final Report would take. No clear indication was given of a likely time frame.

It is therefore presently unclear as to what will happen with Lord Justice Jackson's recommendations. Some of his recommendations can be implemented through judicial decisions, but others (including the major recommendations) will require primary and secondary legislation. To complicate matters, there is the prospect of an election in the near future, and a possible change of government.

Despite these matters, what is clear is that Lord Justice Jackson's recommendations have the full backing of the senior judiciary, who are taking active steps to seek their implementation. We should expect to see significant changes come about as a result of Lord Justice Jackson's Final Report. The big questions are what those changes will be, who will implement them, and when.

For further information please contact a member of our Dispute Resolution Group, or alternatively Julian Bailey.

Julian assisted Lord Justice Jackson in all three Phases of his costs review, including in the preparation of the Final Report.

This article was written for Law-Now, CMS Cameron McKenna's free online information service. To register for Law-Now, please go to www.law-now.com/law-now/mondaq

Law-Now information is for general purposes and guidance only. The information and opinions expressed in all Law-Now articles are not necessarily comprehensive and do not purport to give professional or legal advice. All Law-Now information relates to circumstances prevailing at the date of its original publication and may not have been updated to reflect subsequent developments.

The original publication date for this article was 26/02/2010.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More