ARTICLE
18 January 2008

Release From Work Does Not Amount To A Dismissal

CC
CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang

Contributor

CMS is a Future Facing firm with 79 offices in over 40 countries and more than 5,000 lawyers globally. Combining local market insight with a global perspective, CMS provides business-focused advice to help clients navigate change confidently. The firm's expertise and innovative approach anticipate challenges and develop solutions. CMS is committed to diversity, inclusivity, and corporate social responsibility, fostering a supportive culture. The firm addresses key client concerns like efficiency and regulatory challenges through services like Law-Now, offering real-time eAlerts, mobile access, an extensive legal archive, specialist zones, and global events.

The recent decision of the Scottish Employment Appeal Tribunal in Tom Findlay Co. Ltd v Mrs M Devlin UKEATS/0071/06 provides a useful reminder of two key points in relation to resignation by an employee.
United Kingdom Employment and HR

The recent decision of the Scottish Employment Appeal Tribunal in Tom Findlay & Co. Ltd v Mrs M Devlin UKEATS/0071/06 provides a useful reminder of two key points in relation to resignation by an employee:

1. An employee who submits a resignation on proper notice is not entitled to withdraw it. In tendering their resignation an employee is asserting a right – they are not making an offer which needs to be accepted before it can be effective.

2. When, following such resignation, the employer hires a replacement who is available to start work before the notice period has expired, putting an employee on "garden leave" does not amount to a dismissal.


Mrs Devlin resigned after difficulties arose in her relationship with one of the directors of the Respondent, Findlay. Although her contract required only four weeks notice, she gave 12 weeks notice in her letter of resignation with the effect that her employment would come to an end on 25 November 2005. Having found a suitable replacement for her, Findlay wrote to Mrs Devlin on 7 October 2005, advising her that although she would be paid until 25 November 2005, she would be "released" from work from 21 October 2005. Mrs Devlin claimed unfair dismissal and the Employment Tribunal ruled in her favour.

The Employment Appeal Tribunal allowed Findlay's appeal. It held that Mrs Devlin, in common with all employees, had the right to bring her contractual relationship with Findlay to an end provided she gave sufficient notice. Therefore, resignations tendered in accordance with the employee's contract are not offers which require acceptance; they are simply instances of an employee asserting a right which exists under the contract. Mrs Devlin's resignation letter gave clear and unequivocal notice that she was tendering her resignation so as to bring the contract to an end on 25 November 2005, no other date was agreed and the contract therefore terminated on that date. Findlay's letter of 7 October did not bring the contract to an end, it merely ended Mrs Devlin's obligation to attend work, and so there was no dismissal. The appeal was therefore upheld and the claim dismissed.

While decisions of the Scottish EAT are not binding in England and Wales, it is unlikely that a Tribunal would decline to follow the decision.

This article was written for Law-Now, CMS Cameron McKenna's free online information service. To register for Law-Now, please go to www.law-now.com/law-now/mondaq

Law-Now information is for general purposes and guidance only. The information and opinions expressed in all Law-Now articles are not necessarily comprehensive and do not purport to give professional or legal advice. All Law-Now information relates to circumstances prevailing at the date of its original publication and may not have been updated to reflect subsequent developments.

The original publication date for this article was 14/01/2008.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More