ARTICLE
8 January 2013

Dangers Of Letters Of Intent

Substantial construction works had been carried out entirely under letters of intent which made no provision for liquidated damages for delay.
UK Real Estate and Construction
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Ampleforth Abbey Trust v Turner & Townsend Project Management Ltd [2012] EWHC 2137 (TCC)

Substantial construction works had been carried out entirely under letters of intent which made no provision for liquidated damages for delay. No formal building contract was ever signed. The works were delayed and the Trust claimed against its project managers, claiming that had a fully executed building contract been in place then the Trust would have reached a more favourable outcome in its dispute with the contractor over the delay.  The court found that the project manager had failed to take the reasonable steps required to procure the completed building contract and was therefore in breach of contract. The judge noted that the project manager had failed to exercise sufficient focus on the matters holding up execution of the contract or to exert sufficient pressure on the contractor to finalise the contract. This highlights the importance of ensuring that building contracts are signed, rather than simply relying on letters of intent.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

ARTICLE
8 January 2013

Dangers Of Letters Of Intent

UK Real Estate and Construction
Contributor
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More