ARTICLE
18 April 2017

Mexico Courts Rule Telecom Agency's Interconnection Costs Model "Reasonable"

HK
Holland & Knight

Contributor

Holland & Knight is a global law firm with nearly 2,000 lawyers in offices throughout the world. Our attorneys provide representation in litigation, business, real estate, healthcare and governmental law. Interdisciplinary practice groups and industry-based teams provide clients with access to attorneys throughout the firm, regardless of location.
Mexico's Telecom and Antitrust Federal Courts have issued three resolutions declaring that the model used by the Comisión Federal de Telecomunicaciones (COFETEL) for calculating interconnection costs for fixed and mobile services from 2012 to 2014 was "reasonable."
Mexico Media, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Jose Antonio Prado and Carlos Ochoa are Partners and Alberto Esenaro Arteaga and Lilia Euridice Palma Salas are Associates in the Mexico City office.

Mexico's Telecom and Antitrust Federal Courts have issued three resolutions declaring that the model used by the Comisión Federal de Telecomunicaciones (COFETEL) for calculating interconnection costs for fixed and mobile services from 2012 to 2014 was "reasonable."

The Courts held that COFETEL's decision of using the hypothetical operator for such calculation was not arbitrary and that the public policy was fully justified. The ruling gives legal support to the "bottom-up" model of costs for constructing the most efficient network in order to determine interconnection costs with a market share of 33 percent, based on the fact that no operator could provide reliable information to reflect the market. The decision also confirms that international practices regarding economics and telecommunication can be used to justify the decisions of regulators.

In 2013, the Federal Telecommunications Institute, or Instituto Federal de Telecomunicaciones (IFT), was created as a constitutional autonomous organization at the same level of the executive branch. It was given the authority to independently rule the telecommunications and broadcasting sectors in technical and antitrust issues, replacing COFETEL (technical) and the Comisión Federal de Competencia (antitrust).

Based on the Courts' rulings of 2014, IFT is a substitute authority by constitutional mandate, in charge of enforcing previous acts of regulation and antitrust matters in the telecommunications and broadcasting sectors.

These resolutions provide guidance on IFT's authority for using the economic theory in support of 1) its decisions regarding interconnection disputes and imposing asymmetric measures on preponderant agents or agents with substantial market power, and 2) measures when granting or modifying concessions.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

ARTICLE
18 April 2017

Mexico Courts Rule Telecom Agency's Interconnection Costs Model "Reasonable"

Mexico Media, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

Contributor

Holland & Knight is a global law firm with nearly 2,000 lawyers in offices throughout the world. Our attorneys provide representation in litigation, business, real estate, healthcare and governmental law. Interdisciplinary practice groups and industry-based teams provide clients with access to attorneys throughout the firm, regardless of location.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More