Jersey: Asset Protection Trusts – Why The Recent Interest?

Last Updated: 13 February 2019
Article by James Campbell

Most Read Contributor in Jersey, July 2019

Background

So what precisely is an asset protection trust and what is it, over and above a normal trust that an asset protection trust is seeking to achieve?  This paper considers these issues from a Jersey law perspective and fundamentally asks the question to what extent a Jersey trust, once established, will protect assets from creditor claims.

By way of background a trust exists under Jersey law where a person holds or has vested in him property for the benefit of another person known as a beneficiary (Article 2 of the Trusts (Jersey) Law 1984, as amended (TJL)).  To this end a trust is a tripartite relationship between trustee, property and beneficiary which is consistent with the definition of a trust in most common law trust jurisdictions (to include the DIFC) and the Hague Convention on the law applicable to trusts and on their recognition. 

Of course at the heart of any trust is the requirement for the trustee to safeguard trust assets.  A trustee of a Jersey law trust has clear fiduciary duties in Article 21 of the TJL to act with due diligence, as would a prudent person, to the best of his ability and skill and to observe the utmost good faith.  The draftsman of the TJL clearly had in mind the ordinary prudent man of business test in formulating a trustee's duty of care as a matter of Jersey law.  In terms of investment, subject to the terms of the trust, to further preserve and enhance the value of the trust property.  It follows that a trustee plainly has duties and responsibilities with regard to trust property in their care.

What is an asset protection trust?

It is fair to say that the term "asset protection trust" has developed as an informal description of a trust the primary purpose of which is to safeguard trust assets from claims made by creditors and others usually against the settlor or beneficiaries of a trust. 

Jersey law does not have express asset protection legislation in the same way that other jurisdictions have adopted express legislation in this area.  Other IFCs to include Anguilla, the Bahamas, the Cayman Islands, the Cook Islands and Nevis, amongst others, have brought into force debtor friendly legislation and could, on this basis, be described as "asset protection jurisdictions".  The focus of this debtor friendly legislation, sometimes referred to as "fraudulent transfer legislation", is to restrict a creditor's ability to recover property held within a trust settled under its laws.  Indeed the almost entire exclusion of rights of future creditors in much of this legislation has led to widespread debate and criticism from the international community.

In Jersey the issue of express asset protection legislation has been considered by working parties over the years and broadly speaking one of the conclusions reached is that on the basis that Jersey already has modern and robust trust and insolvency legislation (which include several concepts which have derived from English law, including provisions relating to transactions at an under value and preferences conferred by a person before his bankruptcy), express asset protection legislation is not required.  The Jersey law position on asset protection is a substantive academic subject in its own right and requires a review of Jersey trust and insolvency legislation as well as consideration of the conflict of law and comity position.

Who are the creditors and other claimants?

Of course trusts have long been established by settlors to protect assets from potential creditors or claimants and the concept of an asset protection trust is nothing new.  The rationale being to settle a trust to protect the trust assets from claims commenced against the trust's settlor or beneficiaries.  The potential creditor or claimant class is a wide one.  For example creditors might include breach of contract or negligence claims from persons with whom the settlor transacted business (perhaps transactions of a high risk nature).  Alternatively, forced heirship claims could be made by members of the settlor's family or the executor of the settlor's estate or claims could follow from a trustee in bankruptcy in connection with the administration of an insolvent settlor's estate.  Claims could also be made by a former spouse based on divorce or pursuant to community of property rules.  These examples are not exhaustive.

What has changed in recent times?

What has changed significantly in recent times is the global political risk landscape.  This remains particularly unsettled.  In these times of political instability and uncertainty clients and their professional advisors want advice on asset protection and specifically, to what extent a Jersey trust, once established, will protect assets from creditor claims, be these foreign states or otherwise.

It is clear that political risk is a global issue but what are clients really concerned about here?  At one end of the spectrum, this might be governments or those with absolute power expropriating private assets for public use.  Alternatively, the circumstances may be less extreme (e.g. radical politics resulting in a material change in fiscal policy) but nonetheless requiring a careful analysis to find the correct structuring solution to mitigate risk.

Political risk is one of the motivating factors in much of the private wealth structuring we see today.  This is a global phenomenon.  It impacts upon clients, in differing degrees, from all over the world to include Europe, the Middle East, the Far East and Latin America amongst others.  From a Jersey perspective we have seen a significant number of new structures being established primarily to address these issues and concerns.  In addition the restructuring of existing structures to make them more robust (e.g. this could be as simple as establishing a trust to hold the shares in a family investment company rather than the shares being held directly).  So what does a Jersey trust have to offer by way of asset protection?

Asset protection as a matter of Jersey law

The following is a brief summary of the position which is a substantive academic subject in its own right.

Trust issues:

As a general rule, once assets are settled into trust they will only be available to creditors of the settlor if some procedure exists to enable the transfer into trust to be set aside; or, to the extent (if at all) that the settlor is entitled to receive benefit or call for distributions from the trust.  For example, if the settlor retains a power of revocation over the trust, this is a power which, on the settlor's insolvency, might become exercisable by his trustee in bankruptcy.  Accordingly, the general rule is that trust assets are not available to creditors.  However, this general rule will not apply if the arrangement by which the original trust was settled was not a valid trust (see Article 11 of the TJL which confirms certain circumstances when a trust will be invalid) or where the trust is a sham or where the settlor lacked capacity.  The general rule also won’t apply to any transfer which is incomplete or formally invalid or where the transfer is testamentary in nature and the settlor is still alive.

Of course Jersey's firewall legislation in Article 9 of the TJL provides further protection to a Jersey trust to minimise the impact of any rules of foreign law upon the creation or operation of a trust governed by Jersey law.

General insolvency provisions:

As a starting point no insolvency procedure governed by Jersey law could be initiated in Jersey against a settlor resident outside of Jersey given that Jersey's insolvency legislation applies only to persons who are or have been resident on the island or who have carried on business on the island. 

There is jurisdiction in domestic Jersey law to set aside preferences and transactions at an undervalue made within a given period of bankruptcy.  Clearly this is unlikely to be relevant for a settlor resident outside of Jersey.

Constructive trusts / tracing claims:

The general rule is also unlikely to apply in the case of fraud where, inter alia, a constructive trust might be interposed or tracing claim upheld.  If a trust is set up as a fraud the Royal Court is likely to assist as it made clear In re Esteem 2002 JLR 53.  In this judgment the Royal Court confirmed that tracing forms part of Jersey law where there is an underlying proprietary interest on the part of the claimant.  A proprietary right can be established if there is a fraud giving rise to a constructive trust so that the proceeds are traceable and recoverable in equity or there is a payment by mistake (e.g. a double payment), resulting in it being unconscionable to continue to hold it or if a payment is made for a specific purpose which is not fulfilled so that the recipient holds the money on trust.

Comity / conflict of law:

The principles of comity confer a wide jurisdiction upon the Royal Court to assist foreign courts of friendly jurisdictions.  For example there have been many instances of trustees in bankruptcy or similar persons having authority to administer a foreign bankruptcy applying to the Royal Court for assistance in realising assets.  Ordinarily assistance will be given and whether such a claim is successful will likely depend upon whether the claimant is able to establish a vitiating cause of action.

Whilst the principles of comity confer a wide jurisdiction the Royal Court has expressly recognised the application of Article 9 of TJL (i.e. the firewall provisions) when it comes to determining key issues on Jersey trusts.  The leading judgment here is the case of Mubarak v Mubarak [2008] JRC 136 which concerned long running and bitter divorce proceedings.  The Royal Court made it clear that it could not enforce a judgment of the Family Division of the English High Court which varied or altered a Jersey trust under the UK Matrimonial Causes Act 1973.  In short the Royal Court confirmed that matters relating to a Jersey trust must be determined by Jersey law as specified in Article 9.  The wording of Article 9 has since been improved by further amendments to the TJL.

Solvency of settlor / Pauline action

The general rule will further not apply where a transaction has been entered into by a debtor purely to defeat his existing creditors or anticipated known creditors where that debtor is insolvent at the time or the transaction subsequently renders the debtor insolvent.  The Royal Court in Re Esteem recognised a cause of action founded on the Roman law concept of a Pauline action in these circumstances.  The Roman law concept was founded to assist a claim by a creditor against a third party to rescind any transfer of property made to the third party by the debtor done to frustrate enforcement of the creditor's debt.

Sanctity of a trust recognised by Royal Court

In contrast, where the rationale for a trust or further accretions to a trust fund of a trust is legitimate and not designed to defeat known or anticipated known creditors (e.g. the preservation of wealth and estate planning) the Royal Court has made it very clear that it will uphold the sanctity of the trust arrangement.  The Royal Court confirmed, in Mackinnon v The Regent Trust Company and Ors 2004 JLR 477

"An overriding consideration (one of public policy) is that persons dealing with trustees should be entitled to rely upon the sanctity and validity of a trust instrument, subject to any established cause of action."

Conclusion

Accordingly, the effect of a trust settled under Jersey law when the settlor is clearly solvent and for legitimate purposes may be to preserve assets and make them harder or impossible for creditors to realise them going forward.  This is, in my view, a strong factor as to why Jersey has felt it unnecessary to introduce express asset-protection legislation. 

In terms of the recent interest in the asset protection afforded by a Jersey trust the current turbulent political climate would suggest that deep seated fears over radical politics, the seizure of assets by political means and nation state sovereignty look set to continue.  In these circumstances clients and their advisers will no doubt continue to analyse where and how they want to structure their assets.  Fundamentally, from a Jersey law perspective, provided the settlor is solvent and there is no other established and vitiating cause of action, the Royal Court has made it very clear that it will uphold the sanctity of a trust.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions