ARTICLE
10 August 2015

European Court Of Justice Considers Scope Of Liability For Notified Bodies

M
Matheson
Contributor
Established in 1825 in Dublin, Ireland and with offices in Cork, London, New York, Palo Alto and San Francisco, more than 700 people work across Matheson’s six offices, including 96 partners and tax principals and over 470 legal and tax professionals. Matheson services the legal needs of internationally focused companies and financial institutions doing business in and from Ireland. Our clients include over half of the world’s 50 largest banks, 6 of the world’s 10 largest asset managers, 7 of the top 10 global technology brands and we have advised the majority of the Fortune 100.
The background to this case is that a German plaintiff received breast implants in 2008.
European Union Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The background to this case is that a German plaintiff received breast implants in 2008.  In 2010, it was discovered that a French manufacturer used industrial grade silicone in the implants and the plaintiff subsequently had the implants removed.  As the French company was insolvent, the plaintiff brought proceedings against the German Notified Body for compensation. A Notified Body is the entity responsible for granting the CE mark to medical devices that is needed to place them on the market in the EU.  In this case the German Notified Body had granted the CE mark to the French company for the breast implants.

It was argued by the plaintiff that the German Notified Body had not fulfilled its legal obligations.  The plaintiff maintained that if business records had been reviewed and if the implants had been tested, the use of industrial grade silicone would have been discovered and prevented.  The German District Court dismissed the plaintiff's claim and an appeal was also rejected by the Court of Appeal.  The case then came before the German Federal Court of Justice, who referred a number of questions to the European Court of Justice.  In essence, these questions concern whether Notified Bodies can be liable to individuals if they fail to fulfil their obligations. 

The decision from the European Court of Justice may expand the scope of liability for Notified Bodies which will have wide-ranging consequences. This ruling is eagerly awaited to give clarity on the scope of responsibilities of Notified Bodies.

In similar proceedings in France, a French appeal court recently ruled that the German Notified Body was not liable to French plaintiffs; however, it is open to the European Court of Justice adopt a different stance.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

ARTICLE
10 August 2015

European Court Of Justice Considers Scope Of Liability For Notified Bodies

European Union Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
Contributor
Established in 1825 in Dublin, Ireland and with offices in Cork, London, New York, Palo Alto and San Francisco, more than 700 people work across Matheson’s six offices, including 96 partners and tax principals and over 470 legal and tax professionals. Matheson services the legal needs of internationally focused companies and financial institutions doing business in and from Ireland. Our clients include over half of the world’s 50 largest banks, 6 of the world’s 10 largest asset managers, 7 of the top 10 global technology brands and we have advised the majority of the Fortune 100.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More