ARTICLE
30 April 2018

Publishers Clearing House Sued For Alleged Sweepstakes Law Violations

KM
Klein Moynihan Turco LLP
Contributor
Klein Moynihan Turco LLP (KMT) maintains an extensive practice, with an international client base, in the rapidly developing fields of Internet, telemarketing and mobile marketing law, sweepstakes and promotions law, gambling, fantasy sports and gaming law, data and consumer privacy law, intellectual property law and general corporate law.
The putative class representatives allege that Publishers Clearing House engaged in deceptive marketing practices through direct mail and email marketing campaigns in violation of federal and state law.
United States Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Renowned sweepstakes operator Publishers Clearing House finds itself in hot water after the filing of a nationwide class action sweepstakes lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York.

What sweepstakes law violations are alleged against Publishers Clearing House?

The putative class representatives allege that Publishers Clearing House engaged in deceptive marketing practices through direct mail and email marketing campaigns in violation of federal and state law.  Specifically, the alleged deceptive marketing consisted of the following:

  • Using paper mailings to deceptively intermingle enticements to enter sweepstakes promotions with advertisements and solicitations to order products;
  • Using digital marketing that included false representations for the purpose of creating expectations of winnings, or enhanced chances at winning;
  • Using email marketing that contained misleading and/or deceptive subject lines and headers intended to entice recipients into ordering merchandise by representing that such orders would improve the chances of winning a prize; and
  • Informing consumers that they had won a sweepstakes contest via email and, when the purported winners sought to claim the subject prize, advising consumers that the applicable email message was sent by mistake as a tactic to entice people to continue entering the sweepstakes contests.

Publishers Clearing House has settled similar allegations with state attorneys general at various points in the last 20 years and entered into settlement agreements aimed at prohibiting such deceptive marketing practices.  According to this lawsuit, Publishers Clearing House systematically violated those settlement agreements through the aforementioned marketing campaigns.

Help Prevent Sweepstakes Law Violations

The laws relating to sweepstakes were enacted to, among other ends, protect the public interest from deceptive promotional advertising.  This class action lawsuit against Publishers Clearing House is demonstrative of the legal pitfalls faced by sweepstakes operators.  Before launching any contest or sweepstakes promotion, it is critical to work closely with knowledgeable counsel.

Prizes and Gifts Act Sweepstakes Lawsuit

NCAA Seeks Attorneys' Fees after Sweepstakes Lawsuit Win

Subway to Rethink Sweepstakes Advertising After CARU Inquiry

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

ARTICLE
30 April 2018

Publishers Clearing House Sued For Alleged Sweepstakes Law Violations

United States Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Contributor
Klein Moynihan Turco LLP (KMT) maintains an extensive practice, with an international client base, in the rapidly developing fields of Internet, telemarketing and mobile marketing law, sweepstakes and promotions law, gambling, fantasy sports and gaming law, data and consumer privacy law, intellectual property law and general corporate law.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More