ARTICLE
17 December 2015

‘Implied Certification' Theory Under The False Claims Act To Be Reviewed By U.S. Supreme Court

RS
Reed Smith
Contributor
The U.S. Supreme Court recently granted certiorari in Universal Health Services, Inc. v. United States ex rel. Escobar, No. 15-7, to review the "implied certification" theory of liability under the False Claims Act.
United States Government, Public Sector
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The U.S. Supreme Court recently granted certiorari in Universal Health Services, Inc. v. United States ex rel. Escobar, No. 15-7, to review the "implied certification" theory of liability under the False Claims Act.  In recent years, that theory has been applied in a wide variety of circumstances with increased frequency, exposing defendants to substantial damages and penalties.  Because of this, the Supreme Court's decision could result in significant changes to the scope of False Claims Act liability.

For more information on this topic, please click here.

This article is presented for informational purposes only and is not intended to constitute legal advice.

ARTICLE
17 December 2015

‘Implied Certification' Theory Under The False Claims Act To Be Reviewed By U.S. Supreme Court

United States Government, Public Sector
Contributor
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More