Episode Description
An ATV, a tragic turn, and a court decision that changed everything.
Hosts Gavin and Stephen, dive into the Ontario Court of Appeal's ruling on de Roche v McInnis. The case unravels the duty of care owed not just by drivers, but by vehicle owners, accentuating the utmost importance of insurance and proper training.
They reflect on the broader implications for owners of recreational vehicles, the devastating consequences of negligence, and the workings of statutory interpretation, emphasizing the importance of having insurance for recreational vehicles.
This discussion is a stark reminder that with the thrill of high-speed adventure comes a weighty responsibility, echoing the dire need for precaution and protection in the realm of recreational vehicle use.
Listen For:
3:15 - Introducing the Case: de Roche v McInnis
8:45 - The Duty of Care Explained: Navigating Negligence
17:32 - Understanding Statutory Interpretation
22:41 - Insuring Adventure: The Safety Net of Liability
Leave a rating/review for this podcast with one click
Read Stephen's blog on the McGinnis case
2024 ONCA 63 (CanLII) | Desrochers v. McGinnis | CanLII (McGinnis case)
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.