ARTICLE
12 November 2020

What Are Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye's Question Patterns In Criminal Cases When She Disagrees With The Majority?

AP
Arnold & Porter
Contributor
Arnold & Porter is a firm of more than 1,000 lawyers, providing sophisticated litigation and transactional capabilities, renowned regulatory experience and market-leading multidisciplinary practices in the life sciences and financial services industries. Our global reach, experience and deep knowledge allow us to work across geographic, cultural, technological and ideological borders.
When the Chief Justice joins an affirmance in criminal cases, she averages 3.49 questions to appellants and 1.53 questions to respondents.
United States Criminal Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

When the Chief Justice joins an affirmance in criminal cases, she averages 3.49 questions to appellants and 1.53 questions to respondents. When she joins the majority in a reversal, she averages 3.22 questions to respondents, 2.68 to appellants. When she joins the majority in a split decision, she averages 4.23 questions to appellants, 1.55 to respondents.

When the Chief Justice dissents from a criminal affirmance, she averages 5 questions to appellants, 2 to respondents. When the Chief Justice dissents from a criminal reversal, she averages 11 questions to appellants, 2.67 to respondents.

When the majority votes to affirm but the Chief Justice votes for a split decision, she averages 4.5 questions to appellants, 1 to respondents. When the majority votes for a split decision but the Chief Justice votes to affirm, she averages 6.5 questions to appellants and 1 to respondents.

1004794a.jpg

Join us back here next week as we continue our review of the Justices' oral argument records.

Image courtesy of Flickr by Scott Gustin (no changes).

Originally published by California Supreme Court Review on the 6th of November, 2020

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

ARTICLE
12 November 2020

What Are Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye's Question Patterns In Criminal Cases When She Disagrees With The Majority?

United States Criminal Law
Contributor
Arnold & Porter is a firm of more than 1,000 lawyers, providing sophisticated litigation and transactional capabilities, renowned regulatory experience and market-leading multidisciplinary practices in the life sciences and financial services industries. Our global reach, experience and deep knowledge allow us to work across geographic, cultural, technological and ideological borders.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More