Telecom Firm Altice Fined In France For Breaking Merger Commitments

VB
Van Bael & Bellis

Contributor

Van Bael & Bellis is a leading independent law firm based in Brussels, with a second office in Geneva dedicated to WTO matters. The firm is well known for its deep expertise in EU competition law, international trade law, EU regulatory law, as well as corporate and commercial law. With nearly 70 lawyers coming from 20 different countries, Van Bael & Bellis offers clients the support of a highly effective team of professionals with multi-jurisdictional expertise and an international perspective.
On 30 October 2014, the FCA granted its approval for Altice to take sole control of mobile-telephone operator SFR, subject to certain commitments.
France Antitrust/Competition Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On 19 April 2016, Luxembourg-based telecom group Altice was fined a total of €15 million by the French Competition Authority ("FCA") for failing to comply with certain commitments relating to the acquisition by its subsidiary, Numericable, of rival SFR.

On 30 October 2014, the FCA granted its approval for Altice to take sole control of mobile-telephone operator SFR, subject to certain commitments.  The transaction, as notified, would have resulted in Altice having high market shares in mobile telephony in two French overseas territories in the Indian Ocean: 66% in La Réunion and 90% in Mayotte.  In order to address this, Altice committed to divesting Outremer Télécom, a mobile telephony business which Altice operated in La Réunion and Mayotte.  Further, Altice agreed not to interfere with the management of Outremer Télécom's business, pending its divestment.

However, the FCA discovered that Altice failed to respect its commitments as it interfered in the business to be divested by raising Outremer Télécom's tariffs between 17% and 60%.  These tariff increases put the competitiveness of Outremer Télécom at risk and allowed customers to terminate their contracts without having to pay extra charges.

The commitment breach was aggravated as Altice's decision to increase tariffs was never communicated to the FCA.  Further, the tariff increases were implemented by Altice even though it made a prior commitment to appoint an independent manager to run the divested business.

The FCA considered the tariff increases to be of an "unprecedented form and extent", as they were imposed not only on new customers, but also on existing customers, which, according to the FCA, is a very rare business practice from a commercial perspective.

Altice stated that it reserved its right to appeal against the decision of the FCA.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Telecom Firm Altice Fined In France For Breaking Merger Commitments

France Antitrust/Competition Law

Contributor

Van Bael & Bellis is a leading independent law firm based in Brussels, with a second office in Geneva dedicated to WTO matters. The firm is well known for its deep expertise in EU competition law, international trade law, EU regulatory law, as well as corporate and commercial law. With nearly 70 lawyers coming from 20 different countries, Van Bael & Bellis offers clients the support of a highly effective team of professionals with multi-jurisdictional expertise and an international perspective.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More