Cayman Islands: In The Matter Of Ardon Maroon Asia Master Fund

Last Updated: 5 September 2018
Article by Ben Hobden, Maree Martin and Kevin Butler

Cayman Grand Court rules on the natural and ordinary meaning of fund constitutional documents in preference to following common practice in the funds industry.

In the unreported judgment delivered 17 July 2018, In the matter of Ardon Maroon Asia Master Fund (in official liquidation) Cause no. FSD 18 of 2015, the Hon Justice Robin McMillan found that, in a master-feeder fund structure, a feeder fund redemption was ineffective on the basis that there was a failure by the feeder fund to serve a further redemption notice on the master fund in accordance with the procedures set out in the master fund constitutional documents.


Ardon Maroon Asia Dragon Feeder Fund (the "Feeder Fund") was a feeder fund into Ardon Maroon Asia Master Fund Limited (the "Master Fund") (together, "the Funds"), a structure by which investors would subscribe for shares in the Feeder Fund and the Feeder Fund would use this capital to subscribe for shares in the Master Fund. The Feeder Fund did not retain any liquidity or own any assets other than its Master Fund shareholding and (as is common in such structures) both the Feeder Fund and Master Fund appointed the same service providers including the Investment Manager, Administrator and directors. This structure is one which is common in the Cayman Islands.

On 11 August 2014, an investor in the Feeder Fund (the "Investor") submitted an electronic copy redemption notice for a US$15 million redemption for the 3 October 2014 redemption day (the "Redemption Request") to the Transfer Agent. The Transfer Agent acknowledged receipt on 12 August 2014 and notified the Investment Manager of the Funds that it had received the same on 19 August 2014.

The Master Fund's assets were illiquid and could not be readily realised to meet the Redemption Request. Consequently, on 30 October 2014, the directors of the Funds resolved to suspend redemptions and the payment of redemption proceeds from both Funds. In December 2014, the directors of the Feeder Fund resolved by written resolution that the Administrator should be instructed to record the redemption as a debt due to the investor and adjust the net asset value of the Feeder Fund accordingly.

On 30 December 2014, the Funds passed special resolutions that the Funds should be wound up voluntarily and that joint voluntary liquidators (the "Master Fund JOLs") should be appointed. In 2015, the Investor lodged a proof of debt in the liquidation of the Feeder Fund which was ultimately admitted by the joint official liquidators of the Feeder Fund (the "Feeder Fund JOLs") by consent on 23 March 2016. However, the Master Fund JOLs rejected the Feeder Funds's 'back-to-back' proof of debt. The rejection was on the basis that the Feeder Fund had not completed the redemption process to redeem its shares in the Master Fund as it had not submitted a written notice to do so (as required by the constitutional documents of the Master Fund). An appeal against the rejection of the Feeder fund proof of debt was filed on 1 April 2016.

Matters for Consideration

The key issues in dispute were:

  1. What were the requirements for a valid redemption of the Feeder Fund's shares in the Master Fund? In particular, did the Master Fund constitutional documents permit the redemption of shares without a redemption notice and if so, did the directors of the Master Fund make a determination as to the terms and/ or manner in which shares issued by the Master Fund could be redeemed (i.e. without the need for a separate written redemption request by the Feeder Fund)?
  2. Were the requirements for a valid redemption of the Feeder Fund's shares in the Master Fund met or (if possible) waived by the Master Fund or persons on its behalf?

It was contended by the directors of the Funds and other highly qualified figures in the Cayman Islands hedge fund industry that an automatic or 'back-to-back' redemption at the Master Fund level is a normal and/ or universal practice utilised to avoid the risk of misalignment of the liquidity profiles between the Master Fund and Feeder Fund. The Court found the expert opinions to be "largely irrelevant and unhelpful" in terms of the legal task identified for resolution.

In determining whether the directors of the Master Fund had the power to issue shares on terms that they were capable of being redeemed without a written notice being served, the Court considered the decision of the Privy Council in Innimore Fund Management Limited -v- Fenris Consulting Ltd. [2016] UKPC 9, and the English law principles set out in Arnold -v- Britton [2015] AC 1619.

It was accepted by the Court that when interpreting the meaning of the relevant words in a written contract that meaning has to be assessed in light of: (i) the natural and ordinary meaning of the clause; (ii) any other relevant provisions of the document; (iii) the overall purpose of the clause and the document; (iv) the facts and circumstances known or assumed by the parties at the time that the document was executed; and (v) commercial common sense; but, (vi) disregarding subjective evidence of any party's intentions.

Master Fund Amended and Restated Articles

The following Articles were considered relevant to the analysis:

Article 1 defines "Redeeming Shareholder" as "a Shareholder who has requested the redemption of part or all of his Shares in accordance with these Articles".

"Redemption Notice" is defined as "a notice in writing in such form as the Directors may from time to time determine from a Shareholder requesting the redemption of part or all of his Shares."

Article 9 provides: "Subject to these Articles, all Shares for the time being unissued shall be under the control of the Directors who may:

  1. Issue, allot and dispose of the same to Persons, in such manner, on such terms, and having such rights and being subject to such restrictions as they may from time to time determine;..."

Article 36 provides, so far as is material: "Subject to the Law, the Company may:

  1. Issue shares on terms that they are to be redeemed or liable to be redeemed at the option of the Company or the Shareholder on such terms and in such manner as the Directors may determine, or as may otherwise be determined from time to time;"

Article 37 provides: "Subject to the law, these Articles and any rights and restrictions for the time being attached to any Class or Series:

  1. On receipt by the Company or its authorized agent of a Redemption Notice upon at least such number of days' prior notice as the Directors, in consultation with the Investment Manager, may from time to time determine (subject to the discretion of the Directors, in consultation with the Investment Manager, to waive or reduce such period of notice) the Company shall redeem all or any portion of such Redeeming Shareholders Shares on a Redemption Day at the Redemption Price for the relevant Class and Series..."

Given the comprehensive nature of the redemption procedure set out in the Articles, the Court was unable to accept that the procedure could be disregarded entirely by the directors unless such power to so disregard is expressly permitted.

Determination of the Directors

The Court then turned to whether, if there was an authority to dispense with the Redemption Notice procedure, they did indeed make any determination to that effect.

It was contended by the Appellants that there was a clear and express statement in the Feeder Fund Private Placement Memorandum (the "Dragon PPM") that the redemption procedure for the Master Fund was to be identical to the Feeder Fund procedure, such that it was clearly intended that the same redemption procedure should apply for the purposes of redeeming shares in both of the Funds. Given that the directors were common to both the Feeder Fund and Master Fund it was contended that there was "clear concurrence by the Directors of the Master Fund to the terms of the Dragon PPM".

The Court was not persuaded by this noting that "...there appears to be underlying the argument a conscious infringement of the doctrine of corporate responsibility. In other words, if two companies have the same Directors that surely does not make them one company or enable them to function as one company."

The Appellants submitted that there was clear, unequivocal, credible and independent evidence from the directors as to what their understanding and intentions were as regards the redemption process; namely that there would be an automatic back-to-back redemption of the Master Fund's shares upon the Feeder Fund receiving a valid redemption request from an investor. Adding this to the broad discretion in the Master Fund Articles to determine the applicable redemption procedure it was submitted that the directors made their subjective intentions and understanding sufficiently manifest in order to amount to a "determination". Again, the Court was not persuaded and described the reasoning as "tortuous, speculative and unpersuasive."

In principle, the Court agreed that a redemption at the Feeder Fund level can lead to an automatic corresponding redemption at the Master Fund level without the need for a separate redemption notice to be served if constitutionally authorised, and a determination is made to that effect.

Based on the constitutional documents of the Master Fund and the resolutions passed by the Feeder Fund and Master Fund it was, in the opinion of the Court, the natural and ordinary meaning of the language used that the redemption procedure required two separate identical redemption procedures as between an investor and the Feeder Fund and, subsequently, the Feeder Fund and the Master Fund, and not simply one procedure that served automatically for two purposes.

The Appellants further submitted that if there was a requirement for a separate redemption notice to be served on the Master Fund, then this requirement was waived. Evidence was adduced to indicate that the directors of the Master Fund considered the redemption to be effective at the Master Fund level and it was for this reason that the Master Fund resolved to suspend the payment of redemption proceeds and any further redemptions and thereafter to resolve to wind up the Master Fund. The register of the Master Fund was updated to record the redemption and the Transfer Agent was permitted to proceed on the basis that the redemption in relation to the Master Fund was effective.

As a matter of construction, the Court preferred the view that the requirement for written notice was not capable of being waived (unlike the period of notice) and even if this view was incorrect, found the argument of the Master Fund JOLs compelling that there had not been any unequivocal representation of the Master Fund directors to indicate that there had been an effective redemption.

The Feeder Fund was held to be unsuccessful in its appeal in all respects.

Potential Effects for Cayman Funds

While the judgment touches on a number of themes, the main issue to emerge will likely be that unless the relevant constitutional and offering documents of Cayman master-feeder fund structures are drafted in such a way that a formal process is not required between a feeder fund and a master fund to effect a redemption, then the process, as set out in the constitutional documents, must be followed in order for an effective and valid redemption to take place. While this is not a controversial point from a legal perspective, investors will now be aware that master-feeder redemption processes set out in legal documents are not always being followed to the letter of the agreement by fund administrators.

The second (and perhaps less surprising) theme will be that industry practice is not a defence to non-compliance with constitutional documents and, while it is operationally helpful for the directors of a master and feeder fund to be the same, sufficient and clear corporate records should be maintained by separate legal entities documenting any actions and resolutions of the directors. This is particularly important in the case of master-feeder funds which, while they may share the same board, must still act as distinct legal entities.

For clients operating such master-feeder structures, it would be advisable to:

  1. check with their Administrator and/or fund directors as to what process is being followed upon a redemption and whether written notices are being sent from the feeder to the master if that is what the constitutional documents call for (i.e. are they following the terms of the fund documents specifically or relying on industry practice); and
  2. if necessary, update the fund documents so that the redemption process and documents for the feeder and master are consistent with what is occurring in practice.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions