ARTICLE
11 January 2018

Section 8 And Other Claims Following Failed PMNOC Regulations Proceedings

SB
Smart & Biggar

Contributor

Smart & Biggar uncovers and maximizes intellectual property and technology assets for our clients. Today’s fast-paced innovation economy demands a higher level of expertise and attention to detail when it comes to IP strategy and protection. With over 125 lawyers, patent agents and trademark agents collaborating across five Canadian offices, Smart & Biggar is trusted by the world’s leading innovators to find value in their IP rights. As market leaders in IP, Smart & Biggar’s team is on the pulse when it comes to the latest developments and the wider industry changes that impact our clients. To stay informed, visit smartbiggar.ca/insights, including access to our RxIP Update (smartbiggar.ca/insights/rx-ip-updates), a monthly digest of the latest decisions and law surrounding the life sciences and pharmaceutical industries.
Apotex's initial patent hold was revoked and later re-instated, but only after the PMNOC proceedings had been resolved.
Canada Intellectual Property

On January 19, the SCC denied Teva leave to appeal the FCA's decision that overturned Teva's $125 million award (venlafaxine, EFFEXOR XR) for improper reliance on hearsay evidence and sent the matter back to the trial judge for determination; on May 26, the trial judge reaffirmed the original decision and Pfizer has appealed. On February 27, the Ontario Superior Court dismissed Abbott/Takeda's motion for summary judgment in a section 8 action brought by Apotex regarding its generic lansoprazole (Abbott's PREVACID). Apotex's initial patent hold was revoked and later re-instated, but only after the PMNOC proceedings had been resolved. The Court found that absent the proceedings, the Minister would have issued the Apo-Lansoprazole notice of compliance as of the patent hold date. On March 30 and April 4, the Federal Court awarded Teva section 8 damages in cases regarding pregabalin (Pfizer's LYRICA) and olanzapine (Eli Lilly's ZYPREXA), appeals are pending. On July 26, the reference trial judge quantified Apotex's section 8 losses regarding omeprazole (AstraZeneca's LOSEC) as nil, as Apotex's omeprazole would have infringed an AstraZeneca patent; an appeal is pending.

The preceding is intended as a timely update on Canadian intellectual property and technology law. The content is informational only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. To obtain such advice, please communicate with our offices directly.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More