Corruption crosses borders and anti-corruption efforts require cooperation
On April 29, 2016, the Supreme Court of Canada released its much anticipated decision in World Bank Group v. Wallace.1 The decision highlights that corruption crosses borders and that anti-corruption efforts benefit from a coordinated approach by law enforcement and non-governmental organizations:
Information shared by World Bank Group with RCMP did not result in loss of group's immunity
The central issue was whether immunity was lost by the Integrity Vice Presidency ("INT"), the independent fraud investigation unit of the World Bank, over email tips it received and an investigative report that it drafted when it shared some of that information with the RCMP. The RCMP used that information to obtain wiretap authorizations over individuals who were subsequently charged under the Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act3 with bribing Bangladeshi officials in connection with the World Bank financed Padma Multipurpose Bridge project. As a result of federal legislation giving effect to certain rights conferred on the World Bank Group by its member states, the INT is endowed with immunities which apply to documents in its archives, including the email tips and the investigative report, and its personnel, like INT investigators.
The accused challenged the wiretap authorizations and sought to subpoena the INT investigators and obtain production of contents contained in the investigative file. The Court had to grapple with whether the sharing of information by INT with the RCMP constituted a waiver of its immunity. The issue was resolved in favour of the INT.
Immunity is integral to the World Bank Group's anti-corruption efforts
A contrary result would render it difficult, if not impossible, for the INT to collaborate with national law enforcement agencies in respect of the breach of national laws. If waiver of immunity resulted every time INT shared information with national law enforcement agencies, there might be a chilling effect on INTs willingness to aid in the prosecution of corruption related offences. According to the Court, such an effect would be harmful since the World Bank Group, and other multilateral banks, are "well placed to investigate corruption and to serve at the frontlines of international anti-corruption efforts".4
Implications
The effectiveness of anti-corruption efforts is multiplied when there is collaboration between multilateral institutions on the frontlines and national law enforcement agencies. Entities which are subject to sanction proceedings under the jurisdiction of the World Bank Group should be aware that information shared between the collaborating parties will not be subject to production in proceedings brought by the Crown.
Footnotes
1 2016 SCC 15 [World Bank Group].
2 World Bank Group at para. 1.
3 S.C. 1998, c. 34.
4 World Bank Group at para. 94.
About Dentons
Dentons is the world's first polycentric global law firm. A top 20 firm on the Acritas 2015 Global Elite Brand Index, the Firm is committed to challenging the status quo in delivering consistent and uncompromising quality and value in new and inventive ways. Driven to provide clients a competitive edge, and connected to the communities where its clients want to do business, Dentons knows that understanding local cultures is crucial to successfully completing a deal, resolving a dispute or solving a business challenge. Now the world's largest law firm, Dentons' global team builds agile, tailored solutions to meet the local, national and global needs of private and public clients of any size in more than 125 locations serving 50-plus countries. www.dentons.com
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances. Specific Questions relating to this article should be addressed directly to the author.