Extinctive Prescription And Gradual Damage: What Is The Starting Point?

D
Dentons
Contributor
In the Lacour v. Construction D.M. Turcotte TRO inc. decision delivered in June 2019, the Court of Appeal of Québec distanced itself from the established traditional principles relating to prescription (limitation of actions)...
Canada Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

In the Lacour v. Construction D.M. Turcotte TRO inc.1 decision delivered in June 2019, the Court of Appeal of Québec distanced itself from the established traditional principles relating to prescription (limitation of actions) when damage manifests itself gradually or after a period of time. The Court concluded that the three-year prescription period within such context begins when the cause of the damage is known.

In this case, the appellants (the owners) waited more than 10 years after the first cracks appeared in their home to seek the advice of an expert. After receiving the expert's report on the cause of the cracks, the owners sued the contractor for the defects in the construction of the home. The contractor then filed a motion to dismiss on the ground that the statutory time limit had expired.

Although the appellants acknowledged the damages they had suffered increased substantially over the years, the Court of Appeal concluded that the prescription period began when the owners learned of the conclusions of the expert's report. It was at that time they became aware of the causal link between the contractual fault and the gradual damage that had occurred.

The Court of Appeal, nevertheless, found that the action was time-barred for other reasons.

In this decision, the Court of Appeal distanced itself from the following traditional approach:

  1. In the case of damage that manifests itself gradually or after a period of time, the prescription period began on the day the damage manifested itself appreciably or tangibly, and not from the date the plaintiffs gained knowledge of the cause of the damage; and
  1. The date upon learning the expert's conclusions could not be the starting point for the prescription period.

Footnotes

  1. Lacour c Construction D.M. Turcotte TRO inc., 2019 QCCA 1023 (CanLII).

About Dentons

Dentons is the world's first polycentric global law firm. A top 20 firm on the Acritas 2015 Global Elite Brand Index, the Firm is committed to challenging the status quo in delivering consistent and uncompromising quality and value in new and inventive ways. Driven to provide clients a competitive edge, and connected to the communities where its clients want to do business, Dentons knows that understanding local cultures is crucial to successfully completing a deal, resolving a dispute or solving a business challenge. Now the world's largest law firm, Dentons' global team builds agile, tailored solutions to meet the local, national and global needs of private and public clients of any size in more than 125 locations serving 50-plus countries. www.dentons.com

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances. Specific Questions relating to this article should be addressed directly to the author.

Extinctive Prescription And Gradual Damage: What Is The Starting Point?

Canada Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Contributor
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More