Fraudulent Conveyance, Void As Against Creditors

SN
Speigel Nichols Fox LLP

Contributor

Speigel Nichols Fox LLP
Sole director allowed redemption of his preference shares in closely-held private corporation at nominal amount and then became bankrupt.
Canada Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Jonas v. McConnell 2014 Ont SCJ
Sole director allowed redemption of his preference shares in closely-held private corporation at nominal amount and then became bankrupt. He was held to have engaged in a fraudulent conveyance since consideration was deemed to be grossly inadequate. Redemption was declared void as against creditors.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Fraudulent Conveyance, Void As Against Creditors

Canada Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Contributor

Speigel Nichols Fox LLP
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More