ARTICLE
9 February 2017

Changes To Emergency Leave Requirements In The Auto Industry

SL
Siskinds LLP
Contributor
Since 1937, Siskinds has been that firm of specialists serving individuals, families and businesses in southwestern Ontario and Canada from our offices in London, Sarnia and Quebec City. We’ve grown as the world around us has evolved. Today, we are a team of over 230 lawyers and support staff covering personal, business, personal injury and class action law and over 25 specialized practice areas.
The final report from Ontario's Changing Workplaces Review is expected any day now, but in a taste of what's to come, some changes are already being implemented.
Canada Employment and HR
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The final report from Ontario's Changing Workplaces Review is expected any day now, but in a taste of what's to come, some changes are already being implemented.

Since 2004, s. 50 of the Employment Standards Act, 2000 ("ESA") has required employers with more than 50 employees to provide 10 unpaid emergency leave days annually. These days are available to employees who experience personal illness, injury, medical emergency or other urgent matter, or where a member of the employee's close family experiences death, illness, medical emergency or other urgent matter.

Effective January 1, 2017 however, this requirement has been amended for companies in the automotive industry, which includes:

  • Automobile manufacturing
  • Automobile parts manufacturing
  • Automobile parts warehousing
  • Automobile marshalling (receiving assembled automobiles and storing them for delivery to purchasers or dealers)

The special rules for employees in the automotive sector have now been amended to entitle these employees to:

  • Seven unpaid days off for the previous reasons (illness, injury, medical emergency, urgent matter, etc.) whether personal or for a family member
  • Three unpaid days off because of the death of a close family member

Employers in the highly-unionized automotive industry often struggled to determine whether their collective agreement provisions provided a "greater right or benefit" than the ESA minimum for emergency leave, as collective agreements usually provide specifically for bereavement leave. This change will therefore enable a more straightforward comparison between ESA minimum requirements and the provisions of a collective agreement.

Of course, the change to the ESA regulations likely will not have a significant effect on unionized environments, where the negotiated terms of collective agreements will almost certainly continue to rule the day. However, in non-unionized facilities, this change should assist employers in the management of absenteeism for emergency leave.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

ARTICLE
9 February 2017

Changes To Emergency Leave Requirements In The Auto Industry

Canada Employment and HR
Contributor
Since 1937, Siskinds has been that firm of specialists serving individuals, families and businesses in southwestern Ontario and Canada from our offices in London, Sarnia and Quebec City. We’ve grown as the world around us has evolved. Today, we are a team of over 230 lawyers and support staff covering personal, business, personal injury and class action law and over 25 specialized practice areas.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More