Australia: Judicial review gains momentum in the Australian energy market

Last month, we wrote about the types of decisions which may be open to judicial review under the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) (ADJR Act). This article uses the Australian energy market as a case study on how judicial review operates.

Two recent judicial review decisions by the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia, coupled with recent amendments to the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) (CCA), will likely promote greater recourse to judicial review, reinforcing the important role of administrative law in the functioning of Australian energy markets.

The Australian Energy Regulator (AER) is the government body which supervises the Australian national electricity and gas markets.

Operating under the CCA, the AER among other things makes determinations on the maximum revenues that electricity and gas transmission and distribution networks can earn on their regulated businesses. These amounts are for the most part ultimately recovered from customers through network charges on electricity and gas bills.

Tribunal powers down

Prior to the introduction of the Competition and Consumer Amendment (Abolition of Limited Merits Review) Act 2017 (Cth) (Amending Act), AER decisions were subject to limited merits review by the Australian Competition Tribunal.

The process was limited by the grounds specified as available under the CCA; an applicant had to demonstrate an error of fact, incorrect exercise of discretion, or unreasonableness by the AER.

The Amending Act abolished the limited merits review as an avenue for challenge. However decisions made by the Tribunal were prior to the Amending Act, and continue to be, vulnerable to the broader grounds of judicial review. Following the abolition of limited merits review by the Amending Act, AER decisions are directly subject to judicial review by the Federal Court.

As we have outlined in other publications, judicially reviewable errors of law may manifest in breaches of the rules of natural justice and procedural fairness, decisions not authorised by enactment, improper exercises of power, errors of law on the face of the record, fraud and decisions that were an exercise of power in such an unreasonableness way that no reasonable person could make such a decision.

Below we review two recent cases which, although decided under the previous regime, may shed light on the new regulatory environment.

AER's appeal generates heat

In April and June 2015, the AER determined the maximum revenues that NSW and ACT electricity and gas networks (NSW/ACT Networks) could earn. For the 2014 to 2019 period, the AER rejected $7 billion of the $30 billion revenue proposed by the businesses (Ausgrid, Endeavour Energy, Essential Energy, ActewAGL and Jemena Gas Networks (NSW)).1 The determinations were based, at least in part, on findings that the NSW/ACT Networks were not operating as efficiently as others. The AER also determined a lower rate of return and corporate tax allowance, consistent with market trends.

Numerous grounds add up to high voltage dispute

On the (previously available) limited merits review sought by those NSW/ACT Networks, the Australian Competition Tribunal (Tribunal) directed the AER to remake its decisions in relation to the networks' operating expenses, cost of corporate income tax and cost of debt.

The AER then applied for judicial review of the Tribunal's decision under the ADJR Act on the following grounds:

  • the Tribunal failed to undertake its review function lawfully by failing to properly construe and apply the grounds of review under the National Electricity Law (NEL) and National Gas Law (NGL);
  • in contravention of the NEL and NGL, the Tribunal allowed the providers to raise, in relation to whether a ground of review existed, matters that were not raised and maintained in submissions to the AER before the reviewable regulatory decisions were made;
  • the Tribunal erred in its construction of new provisions in the National Electricity Rules (NER) and the National Gas Rules (NGR) relating to the determination of the rate of return on capital, the value of imputation credits (gamma) and the operating expenditure criteria; and
  • the Tribunal's decision was otherwise infected with reviewable errors, including reasoning that was irrational, unreasonable and/or uncertain.

On 24 May 2017, while agreeing with the AER in respect of the Tribunal's construction of the rules regarding gamma, the Full Court dismissed the AER's application regarding the Tribunal's rulings on return on debt and operating expenses, finding that the Tribunal's construction of the NER and NGR on these points did not involve an error of law.2 As the application was dismissed, the AER is required to remake its decisions.3

Black out for network's appeal

More recently, in SA Power Networks,4 the Full Court of the Federal Court dismissed an appeal by SA Power Networks to charge more for electricity distribution, which would have increased bills for consumers.

The AER's decision denied the company's application to receive $4.53 billion from customers over the 2015 to 2020 period,5 and instead allocated $3.84 billion. The Tribunal upheld the decision. SA Power Networks then applied for judicial review of the Tribunal's findings under the ADJR Act. The company claimed that, in the course of reviewing the AER's decision on a limited merits review, the Tribunal had made 21 judicially reviewable errors in interpreting provisions of the NER in three key areas:

  • the determination of cost of corporate income tax (gamma);
  • return on debt; and
  • forecast labour costs escalation.

Arguments full of hot air

On 18 January 2018, the Full Court ruled against SA Power Networks on all 21 grounds and ordered the company to pay costs. The Court found that the construction of the NER which had been adopted was correct, the Tribunal had not misunderstood its functions, and procedural fairness had been accorded. Accordingly, the application was dismissed and the AER's allocation was enforced.

Watt about legislative reform?

Following a great deal of discontent expressed by various stakeholders, the Amending Act was passed by both Houses in late 2017. The Amending Act applies to AER decisions, past or future, unless an application for limited merits review was made before 21 June 2017 (when the reforms were announced).

To date, no judicial review applications have been made under the reforms.

Lights out for limited merits review

The Amending Act abolished limited merits review by the Tribunal of decisions made under energy laws, though there is a carve out for decisions relating to the disclosure of confidential or protected information. Where the NEL or NGL gives the Tribunal the power to make decisions about the disclosure of confidential or protected information, any application about disclosure can be brought to the Tribunal.

Review process recircuited

Under the new regime, review of AER decisions lies to the Federal Court by way of judicial review.

Some critics suggest that the Federal Court may lack the technical credentials possessed by the Tribunal, however the overwhelming majority of commentary recognises the changes are a victory for consumers.


  • judicial review offers a more transparent avenue for challenging AER decisions; and
  • faster resolution of legal challenges will bolster both regulatory certainty for networks and price certainty for consumers.
    Nevertheless, the Full Court's decisions on the AER's NSW/ACT Networks and SA Power Networks decisions demonstrate the difficulties associated with judicial review challenges.


1 Applications by Public Interest Advocacy Centre Ltd and Ausgrid [2016] ACompT 1 (ACT 1 of 2015, ACT 4 of 2015) (Ausgrid); Applications by Public Interest Advocacy Centre Ltd and Endeavour Energy [2016] ACompT 2 (ACT 2 of 2015, ACT 6 of 2015); Applications by Public Interest Advocacy Service Ltd and Essential Energy [2016] ACompT 3 (ACT 3 of 2015); Application by ActewAGL Distribution [2016] ACompT 4 (ACT 5 of 2015) (together NSD 415 of 2016, NSD 416 of 2016, NSD 418 of 2016 and NSD 419 of 2016); and Application by Jemena Gas Networks (NSW) Ltd [2016] ACompT 5 (ACT 8 of 2015) (NSD 420 of 2016).

2 Australian Energy Regulator v Australian Competition Tribunal (No 2) [2017] FCAFC 79 and Australian Energy Regulator v Australian Competition Tribunal (No 3) [2017] FCAFC 80.

3 Following publication of draft determinations and consultation with stakeholders, the AER's final decisions are due to be remade in October 2018.

4 SA Power Networks v Australian Competition Tribunal (No 2) [2018] FCAFC 3.

5 Application by SA Power Networks [2016] ACompT 11.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions