ARTICLE
7 July 2017

The Trans-Pacific Partnership: Lessons learned for ISDS

CC
Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Contributor

With over 175 years of experience and a team of over 1000 talented professionals, we offer exceptional legal services for major transactions, projects, and disputes. Our client-focused approach and commitment to excellence ensure success for our clients. We connect with top lawyers globally for the best results.
President Trump signed an executive order withdrawing the United States from the trade deal following his inauguration.
Australia International Law
DOWNLOAD

Following the United States' presidential election in 2016, the prospects of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) entering into force have faded.

The trade deal already faced fierce resistance from a divided US Congress and, although largely symbolic, on 23 January 2017 President Trump signed an executive order withdrawing the United States from the trade deal following his inauguration. The implications of the stalled trade deal are yet to be realised, but there are significant lessons to take away from the investor–state dispute settlement (ISDS) chapter with respect to both the enforcement mechanism and the substantive rights granted to foreign investors under the ISDS provisions.

The full text of this original chapter, addressing both these issues, is available above.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Chambers Asia Pacific Awards 2016 Winner – Australia
Client Service Award
Employer of Choice for Gender Equality (WGEA)

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More