Special leave to appeal to High Court granted for important case on bank guarantees

The High Court will consider ordinary principles of contractual construction and those specific to letters of credit.
Australia Finance and Banking
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On 5 May 2016, Justices Nettle and Gordon granted special leave to appeal the decision of the New South Wales Court of Appeal in Simic v New South Wales Land and Housing Corporation [2015] NSWCA 413.

Kemp Strang has acted for ANZ during the course of the proceedings which were first heard before Justice Kunc in the New South Wales Supreme Court and by Chief Justice Bathurst and Justices Ward and Emmett on appeal.

Both Justice Kunc and the Court of Appeal found that misdescription of the name of a favouree of a bank guarantee did not preclude the intended favouree from calling on the guarantee.

The High Court will examine the interrelationship between ordinary principles of contractual construction and those that are specific to letters of credit, being the strict compliance principle and the autonomy principle.

The matter will be listed for hearing before the High Court in July 2016.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Kemp Strang has received acknowledgements for the quality of our work in the most recent editions of Chambers & Partners, Best Lawyers and IFLR1000.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Special leave to appeal to High Court granted for important case on bank guarantees

Australia Finance and Banking

Contributor

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More