ARTICLE
26 August 2015

Third Circuit Rules That New Jersey Sports Gambling Law Violates PASPA

KM
Klein Moynihan Turco LLP

Contributor

Klein Moynihan Turco LLP (KMT) maintains an extensive practice, with an international client base, in the rapidly developing fields of Internet, telemarketing and mobile marketing law, sweepstakes and promotions law, gambling, fantasy sports and gaming law, data and consumer privacy law, intellectual property law and general corporate law.
On August 25, 2015, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, by a 2-1 decision, affirmed a lower court ruling that held New Jersey's sports gambling law violates the federal Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act ("PASPA").
United States Media, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

On August 25, 2015, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, by a 2-1 decision, affirmed a lower court ruling that held New Jersey's sports gambling law violates the federal Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act ("PASPA"). The law, passed by the New Jersey legislature in 2014 (the "2014 Law"), was crafted after an earlier version of the same law was found to violate PASPA. In its previous ruling, the Third Circuit noted that it did "not see how having no law in place governing sports wagering is the same as authorizing it by law." The 2014 Law attempted to do just that by purportedly removing restrictions on sports gambling in certain places in New Jersey. Despite the legislature's best efforts to pass a sports gambling law that does not violate PASPA, the Third Circuit nevertheless ruled that "the 2014 Law violates PASPA because it authorizes by law sports gambling."

How does the New Jersey Sports Gambling Law Violate PASPA?

New Jersey Sports Gambling Law Violates PASPA

PASPA makes it unlawful for, among other things, "a governmental entity to sponsor, operate, advertise, promote, license, or authorize by law or compact . . ." sports gambling. The Court rejected New Jersey's argument that the 2014 Law does not provide authority for sports gambling because "[a]bsent the 2014 Law, New Jersey's myriad laws prohibiting sports gambling would apply to the casinos and racetracks. Thus, the 2014 Law provides the authorization for conduct that is otherwise clearly and completely legally prohibited." Additionally, the Court found that the statute violates PASPA because "the 2014 Law authorizes sports gambling by selectively dictating where sports gambling may occur, who may place bets in such gambling, and which athletic contests are permissible subjects for such gambling."

Protect Yourself

New Jersey State Senator Ray Lesniak has indicated that New Jersey will request an en banc hearing by the entire Third Circuit on this issue. As we have previously done, we will continue to post updates concerning New Jersey's continued attempts to decriminalize sports gambling.

If you are interested in learning more about this topic, please e-mail us at info@kleinmoynihan.com or call us at (212) 246-0900.


Similar blog posts:

New Jersey Governor Christie Loses Appeal to Legalize Sports Gambling

New Jersey and California Internet Poker and Online Gaming News

New Jersey Sets Compliance Deadline for Internet Gaming Affiliates

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More