ARTICLE
13 November 2014

Proposed Changes To TILA-RESPA Integrated Disclosure

BS
Butler Snow LLP

Contributor

Butler Snow LLP is a full-service law firm with more than 360 attorneys and advisors collaborating across a network of 27 offices in the United States, Europe and Asia. Butler Snow attorneys serve clients across more than 70 areas of law, representing clients from Fortune 500 companies to emerging start-ups
The CFPB proposed two changes to the TILA-RESPA Integrated Disclosure Final Rule which was issued last November and becomes effective August 15, 2015.
United States Finance and Banking
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

In October, the CFPB proposed two changes to the TILA-RESPA Integrated Disclosure Final Rule which was issued last November and becomes effective August 15, 2015. The proposed changes include: (1) an adjustment to the timing requirement for giving revised disclosures when the consumer locks the interest rate after the initial loan estimate disclosures have been given, (2) an amendment allowing language relating to new construction loans to be included on the loan estimate form, (3) an amendment to provide for placement of the NMLSR ID number on the integrated disclosures, and (4) several technical corrections and wording changes.

Under the integrated disclosure rule, a creditor must provide a revised loan estimate disclosure re-disclosing interest rate dependent charges and loan terms on the date that the interest rate is locked. The Bureau is proposing to allow creditors until the next business day after the rate lock occurs to provide the re-disclosure, rather than requiring it be provided on the same say as the rate lock. The Bureau is concerned that the same day re-disclosure requirement may cause creditors to impose cut off times or limits on a consumer's ability to lock rates at a time of the consumer's choosing. The Bureau is seeking comment on whether one business day is sufficient for creditors to provide the re-disclosure and whether consumer harm would result if the Bureau were to allow more than one business day for the re-disclosure.

Second, the Bureau is proposing to amend the rule to provide for the placement of language on the loan estimate form for new construction loans that is required in order for creditors to redisclose estimated charges. On new construction loans when settlement is expected to occur more than 60 days after the initial loan estimate is given, the creditor may give a revised disclosure if the original disclosure states the creditor may issue revised disclosures at any time prior to 60 days before consummation. As originally issued, the integrated disclosure rule did not permit that statement to be included on the form. The proposed change would correct that and allow the statement to be included.

The proposal would also amend the Reg. Z section which lists the specific documents that must contain the loan originator's name and NMSLR ID to include both the initial loan estimate and loan closing disclosures. Technical corrections include various non-substantive changes to sections of the commentary to clarify the intent of those sections.

Comments are due by November 10, 2014.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

ARTICLE
13 November 2014

Proposed Changes To TILA-RESPA Integrated Disclosure

United States Finance and Banking

Contributor

Butler Snow LLP is a full-service law firm with more than 360 attorneys and advisors collaborating across a network of 27 offices in the United States, Europe and Asia. Butler Snow attorneys serve clients across more than 70 areas of law, representing clients from Fortune 500 companies to emerging start-ups
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More