ARTICLE
16 April 2025

Chief Justice Roberts Allows Trump To Remove Wilcox From NLRB As The Supreme Court Considers The Challenge To Her Dismissal

SM
Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton

Contributor

Sheppard Mullin is a full service Global 100 firm with over 1,000 attorneys in 16 offices located in the United States, Europe and Asia. Since 1927, companies have turned to Sheppard Mullin to handle corporate and technology matters, high stakes litigation and complex financial transactions. In the US, the firm’s clients include more than half of the Fortune 100.
National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB") Member Gwynne Wilcox is out of a job for the third time in less than four months.
United States Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Listen to this post

National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB") Member Gwynne Wilcox is out of a job for the third time in less than four months.

Since President Donald Trump terminated Wilcox from her position on January 28, 2025, Wilcox's challenge to the dismissal has ricocheted between the courts, resulting in an initial order by the U.S. District Court of the District of Columbia ordering Wilcox's reinstatement, a three-judge panel on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals reversing the District Court, and the full D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals reversing course yet again and upholding the District Court's original decision.

On April 9, 2025, the Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, John Roberts, weighed in and issued an "administrative stay" of the full D.C. Circuit's order in response to an emergency application filed by the Trump Administration, effectively upholding Trump's termination of Wilcox, yet again, until the Supreme Court decides the underlying matter.

Chief Justice Roberts has requested Wilcox respond to Trump's emergency application to the Supreme Court by April 15. As it currently stands, Wilcox is removed from her position and the NLRB is left without a three-member statutory quorum to hear cases.

For an in-depth summary of the facts and the constitutional issues at stake, please refer to our initial reports on the district court's ruling here, the subsequent reversal by the U.S. Court of Appeals three-judge panel here, and the decision reached by the full U.S. Court of Appeals here.

The primary issue the Supreme Court is tasked with relates to Humphrey's Executor v. U.S., 295 U.S. 602 (1935), a Supreme Court decision which allowed Congress to enact statutory requirements for the President to remove officers of certain types of independent agencies.

As Wilcox's termination now heads for Supreme Court review, we will continue to monitor future developments on our blog. Employers with questions about how the decision affects them should consult experienced labor counsel.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More