ARTICLE
8 April 2025

Ayala Files Medical Trademark Violation Lawsuit In Federal Court

AL
Ayala Law

Contributor

Ayala Law PA is an established, Miami-based litigation law firm founded 12 years ago by Peruvian immigrant and distinguished attorney, Eduardo A. Maura, Esq.

At Ayala, we believe that everybody deserves top-tier legal representation, providing our services at accessible prices, without compromising the quality of our work.

Backed by an AV Preeminent rating and acknowledgment from Best Lawyers, we specialize in providing high-caliber legal services in litigation, focusing on business litigation, construction litigation, real estate litigation, as well as class action litigation. Our attorney, Eduardo Maura, has been recognized by Best Lawyers for two consecutive years, highlighting his outstanding contributions to the legal field. Additionally, Ayala Law has also been recognized as one of America's Best Law Firms for 2025 by Best Lawyers.

Ayala Law has filed a trademark infringement lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Central District of California on behalf of its client.
United States California Intellectual Property

Ayala Law has filed a trademark infringement lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Central District of California on behalf of its client. The case involves allegations of unauthorized use of a federally registered trademark in the medical services industry, raising key issues under federal and state law.

The lawsuit asserts claims under Section 32(1) of the Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. § 1114(1)) for trademark infringement and Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)) for unfair competition, along with related claims under California law.

The Core of the Dispute: Trademark Infringement and Consumer Confusion

The plaintiff has used the disputed trademark in commerce for nearly a decade and holds federal trademark registrations, including incontestable status under the Lanham Act. According to the complaint, the defendant has been using a nearly identical mark in marketing and providing similar services—leading to consumer confusion and unfair competition.

Key Allegations in the Lawsuit

The complaint details how the defendant:

  • Continued using the infringing mark despite receiving notice of the trademark owner's priority rights.
  • Refused to comply with a cease-and-desist request, even after being formally notified of the infringement.
  • Engaged in unfair competition, gaining an improper advantage by leveraging a name closely resembling the registered trademark.

Legal Remedies Sought

Ayala Law is pursuing:

  • An injunction to prevent further use of the disputed mark.
  • Monetary damages, including profits gained from the unauthorized use.
  • Attorney's fees and litigation costs, as permitted under federal trademark

Why Trademark Protection Matters

This case underscores the importance of defending intellectual property rights. Trademark infringement can lead to consumer confusion, reputational damage, and financial harm for businesses that have worked to establish their brand identity. At Ayala Law, we're committed to ensuring that companies can operate without the threat of unfair competition or brand dilution.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More