ARTICLE
9 December 2021

Chief ALJ Bullock Issues Initial Determination Of Violation Of Section 337 In Certain Cloud-Connected Wood-Pellet Grills (337-TA-1237)

OM
Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P

Contributor

Oblon is among the largest US law firms that exclusively practice IP law. Businesses worldwide depend on Oblon to establish, protect and leverage their IP assets. Our team of 100+ legal professionals includes some of the country’s most respected practitioners. Most attorneys hold advanced degrees in engineering, physics, chemistry, biotechnology and other scientific disciplines. Oblon is headquartered within steps of the USPTO office in Alexandria, Virginia. 
On December 6, 2021, Chief ALJ Charles E. Bullock issued a notice of his initial determination ("ID") finding a violation of section 337...
United States Oregon Utah Intellectual Property

On December 6, 2021, Chief ALJ Charles E. Bullock issued a notice of his initial determination ("ID") finding a violation of section 337 in Certain Cloud-Connected Wood-Pellet Grills and Components Thereof (Inv. No. 337-TA-1237).

By way of background, this investigation was instituted on January 4, 2021 based on a complaint filed by Traeger Pellet Grills LLC of Salt Lake City, Utah ("Traeger") alleging violations of section 337 by Respondent GMG Products LLC of Lakeside, Oregon ("GMG" or "Respondent") due to the importation/sale of certain cloud-connected wood-pellet grills and components thereof that infringe certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 10,158,720 ("the '720 Patent") and U.S. Patent No. 10,218,833 ("the '833 Patent").  GMG was previously granted summary determination of non-infringement as to the '833 patent, which was affirmed by the Commission.  See our November 22, 2021 post for more details regarding the Commission's opinion.

According to the notice, the Chief ALJ found a violation of section 337 with respect to the '720 patent based on the following conclusions of law:

  1. The Commission has subject matter jurisdiction over this investigation, in personam jurisdiction over Respondent, and in rem jurisdiction over the accused cloud-connected wood-pellet grills and components thereof.
  1. There has been an importation into the United States, sale for importation, or sale within the United States after importation of the accused products by Respondent.
  1. The accused products infringe claims 1 and 2 of the '720 patent.
  1. The accused products do not infringe claims 12, 16, 21, and 22 of the '720 patent
  1. Certain domestic industry products practice claims 1 and 2 of the '720 patent.
  1. Respondent is estopped from challenging the invalidity of the '720 patent based on the asserted prior art.
  1. The '720 patent is not unenforceable for inequitable conduct.

We will post the public version of the ID when it becomes available.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More