ARTICLE
26 March 2010

Tax Provisions In Hire And Health Care Legislation

Included in the legislation coming out of Washington over the past week are a number of revenue raisers that will be of interest to the financial community, including banks, funds, investors, and investment professionals.
United States Tax
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Included in the legislation coming out of Washington over the past week are a number of revenue raisers that will be of interest to the financial community, including banks, funds, investors, and investment professionals.

In particular, a number of significant tax compliance and reporting provisions were included in the "Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment Act" (the "HIRE Act"), which was signed into law on March 18, 2010. The HIRE Act's primary legislative focus is on incentivizing new hiring, but of greater note to many non- US financial institutions, non-US hedge funds, and non-US private equity funds are the compliance and reporting revenue offsets to those incentives, which are based on (but not identical to) the previously proposed "Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act of 2009" ("FATCA"). As with FATCA, the foreign account tax compliance provisions of the HIRE Act are aimed at curbing tax evasion by US persons through the use of foreign financial accounts.

Also of particular interest, the "Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act" (the "Health Care Act"), which was signed by President Obama yesterday, and the related "Reconciliation Act of 2010" (the "Reconciliation Act") contain two noteworthy revenue offsets that will increase the Medicare tax on wages and self-employment income by 0.9% and will subject unearned income to a 3.8% Medicare tax, in each case for individuals earning more than $200,000 per year ($250,000 per year in the case of married individuals filing jointly).

HIRE Act

Most notable of the HIRE Act's foreign account tax compliance provisions is the imposition of a punitive US withholding tax on certain payments to non-US entities that fail to comply with various disclosure requirements relating to ownership by US persons, beginning in 2013. The HIRE Act also contains reporting requirements for individual taxpayers with offshore financial accounts and certain other foreign financial assets, including interests in offshore hedge funds and private equity funds, an extended statute of limitations for certain offshore income, and other compliance provisions (including new PFIC reporting rules and the repeal of certain rules relating to bearer bonds). Additionally, the HIRE Act treats certain dividend equivalent payments on swaps as dividends for US withholding tax purposes. A summary of the key provisions is set out below:

  • Rules Applicable to Foreign Financial Institutions:

The HIRE Act effectively requires a "foreign financial institution" to enter into a far reaching reporting agreement with the Treasury, prior to 2013, by providing that a foreign financial institution that fails to enter into such an agreement will generally be subject to a 30% US withholding tax on all "withholdable payments," which term encompasses the payment of interest (including original issue discount), dividends, and other US source payments traditionally subject to US withholding tax, and any gross proceeds from sale or other disposition of US stocks, bonds, or other debt instruments, made after December 31, 2012, with a grandfathering exception for debt obligations outstanding on March 18, 2012 (the two year anniversary of the HIRE Act).

With limited exceptions,1 the foreign financial institution must agree with the Treasury: (i) to obtain information on all of its accounts to determine which accounts are "United States accounts;" (ii) to verify such information through required due diligence; (iii) to annually report information on its United States accounts to the Treasury; (iv) to withhold in respect of any "passthru payments"2 to any account holder that fails to produce the required information (a "recalcitrant account holder") or to another foreign financial institution that itself does not comply with these rules3 (alternatively, the foreign financial institution may elect to allow counterparties to withhold on the portion of any withholdable payments to it that are allocable to a recalcitrant account holder or to another non-compliant foreign financial institution);4 (v) to comply with any requests by the Treasury for additional information on United States accounts; and (vi) to attempt to obtain a waiver of any foreign law from each US account holder that would prevent the foreign financial institution from reporting to the Treasury any required information so obtained and if such waiver is not obtained, to close the account.

For purposes of these rules:

  • A "foreign financial institution" is any foreign entity that is a "financial institution," which is broadly defined to include any institution which: (i) accepts deposits in the ordinary course of a banking or similar business; (ii) holds financial assets for the account of others as a substantial portion of its business; or (iii) is engaged, or holds itself out as being engaged, primarily in the business of investing, reinvesting, or trading in securities, partnership interests, commodities, or any interest (including a future, forward contract, or option) in the foregoing. According to the Joint Committee on Taxation explanation of the HIRE Act, "the term financial institution may include among other entities, investment vehicles such as hedge funds and private equity funds" (emphasis added).5
  • A "United States account" means a "financial account" (which term includes traditional depository and custodial accounts, and also includes any equity or debt interest in a financial institution, though it does not include interests that are regularly traded on an established securities market) held by one or more "specified United States persons" (which term generally includes all US persons, other than tax-exempt entities, RICs, REITs, and publicly traded corporations and their affiliates) or "United States owned foreign entities" (which term generally includes foreign entities with a "substantial United States owner" – meaning greater than 10% ownership by a specified United States person, or in the case of an investment fund that is a foreign financial institution, any ownership by a specified United States person).

Weaved into this matrix of rules and definitions are a number of very important points of interest. First, these rules will undoubtedly lead to a significant amount of incremental administrative burden for entities that are considered foreign financial entities, even for institutions with well developed compliance infrastructures,6 and will presumably lead to a revamp of the information reported under the existing IRS Form W-8 regime (unless a supplemental reporting regime is developed). Second, there may be uncertainty as to what entities are foreign financial institutions, particularly in relation to offshore private equity funds, and when a foreign entity will be treated as a United States owned foreign entity, particularly in relation to offshore funds (including feeder funds). Third, these rules will create adverse timing and compliance burdens on foreign entities affected by these rules that are entitled to the benefits of income tax treaties with the United States. For example, a US tax treaty may generally reduce or eliminate US withholding tax on certain payments to a foreign financial institution, but if that entity does not enter into the agreement described above, it will be subject to full withholding at the time of payment and will need to seek a refund (or credit).

  • Rules Applicable to Other Foreign Entities:

The HIRE Act effectively requires any "non-financial foreign entity" (which is defined as any foreign entity that is not a financial institution – i.e., that is not a foreign financial institution) receiving withholdable payments beneficially owned by it, or by another non-financial foreign entity, to disclose its substantial US owners or certify that it does not have any substantial US owners. A non-financial foreign entity that fails to disclose the required information will be subject to 30% US withholding tax on all withholdable payments made after December 31, 2012 (i.e., as if it were a non-compliant foreign financial institution). Although there are limited carve-outs7 this provision would generally include all offshore hedge funds and private equity funds that are not considered foreign financial institutions because, as investment funds, they will be subject to the special rule described above that all specified United States persons are deemed to be substantial United States owners.

  • Reporting Requirements for Individuals with Foreign Financial Assets:

Beginning in 2011, US individual taxpayers will be subject to expanded reporting obligations (and substantial penalties for failure to satisfy such reporting obligations) with respect to any interest in any "specified foreign financial assets," which generally include any financial account maintained in a foreign financial institution (which includes equity of the foreign financial institution), and, to the extent not held in an account maintained by a financial institution, stocks and securities of, financial instruments with a counterparty that is, or contracts issued by, a foreign entity, or any interest in a foreign entity. This provision would require disclosure by US individual taxpayers of most investments in offshore hedge funds and private equity funds.

It should be noted that this provision potentially overlaps with certain of the reporting requirements imposed by Treasury Department Form TD F 90-22.1, "Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts" (the "FBAR"). The FBAR rules require reporting with respect to "foreign financial accounts" (as defined under the FBAR rules), and there has been significant uncertainty as to whether that term included interests in offshore hedge funds and private equity funds. The Treasury recently announced in Notice 2010-23 that, for purposes of FBARs with respect to calendar years 2009 and earlier, it would not interpret the term "foreign financial account" to include interests in offshore hedge funds and private equity funds, and the proposed FBAR regulations issued in connection with such notice stated that the Treasury was still considering whether the term "foreign financial account" would encompass interests in offshore hedge funds and private equity funds for purposes of FBARs with respect to calendar years 2010 and later.

  • Statute of Limitations:

The statute of limitations for assessment of tax is extended to six years on an understatement of gross income in excess of $5,000 that is attributable to a specified foreign financial asset that generally is required to be reported as described above. Previously, the six year statute of limitations was reserved for substantial omissions of income (which generally required an omission of gross income exceeding 25% of the amount of gross income reported on the applicable tax return).

  • PFIC Shareholder Reporting Requirements:

PFIC shareholders are required to file an annual report containing any information required by the Treasury. In this regard, we note that, for purposes of the PFIC rules, US persons are treated as owning both directly held stock and certain indirectly held stock. Until these information requirements are specified, the impact of this rule will remain uncertain, but this could create access to information problems of the type currently faced by investors in PFICs seeking to make QEF elections and could have broad applicability.

  • Repeal of Bearer Bond Exemptions:

The HIRE Act amends the rules with respect to bearer bonds – affecting both holders and issuers – by removing such bonds from the list of instruments that qualify for the portfolio interest exemption from US withholding tax and denying the deduction for interest on such bonds. These changes apply to bonds issued after March 18, 2012 (the two year anniversary of the HIRE Act), so all bonds issued prior to that date will be fully grandfathered.

  • Dividend Equivalent Payments Treated as Dividends:

With respect to payments made on or after September 14, 2010 (180 days after the enactment of the HIRE Act), "dividend equivalent payments" will be subject to US withholding tax in the same manner as corresponding US source dividends. A "dividend equivalent payment" is any payment pursuant to a securities lending or sale-repurchase transaction or certain notional principal contracts8 that are contingent upon, or determined by reference to, the payment of a dividend from sources within the United States. With respect to payments made after March 18, 2012 (the two year anniversary of the HIRE Act), all dividend equivalent payments on any notional principal contract will also be subject to these rules, unless excepted by the Treasury.9

Health Care Act/Reconciliation Act

  • Medicare Tax on Earned Income:

The Health Care Act/Reconciliation Act would increase the Medicare tax imposed on individuals from wages and self employment income by 0.9% (i.e., 3.8% in total when combined with the employer portion), beginning in 2013, on wages and self employment income in excess of $200,000 per year ($250,000 per year in the case of married individuals filing jointly). Employers will be required to withhold the extra 0.9% Medicare tax on an employee's wages in excess of $200,000 per year, regardless of the wages earned by the employee's spouse. The Health Care Act/Reconciliation Act would not eliminate the cap on Social Security taxes.

  • Medicare Tax on Unearned Income:

The Reconciliation Act would impose an additional Medicare tax on individuals, beginning in 2013, equal to 3.8% of the lesser of the individual's (i) "net investment income" or (ii) its adjusted gross income in excess of $200,000 per year ($250,000 per year in the case of married individuals filing jointly). This "lesser of" test ensures that all taxpayers get the benefit of the $200,000 per year floor ($250,000 per year in the case of married individuals filing jointly) but effectively means that any taxpayer with earned income in excess of the floor will be subject to the new Medicare tax on all of its unearned income. For purposes of this rule, net investment income includes: (i) income from interest, dividends, annuities, royalties, and rents (other than income derived from any trade or business not described in clause (ii)); (ii) income from a trade or business that is a passive activity with respect to the individual or consists of trading financial instruments or commodities; and (iii) net gain (to the extent taken into account in computing taxable income) attributable to the disposition of property (other than property held in a trade or business not described in clause (ii)). Net investment income is determined after taking into account the deductions properly allocable to the income included therein. The Reconciliation Act would also impose the 3.8% Medicare tax on a trust or an estate to the extent of the lesser of its (i) undistributed net investment income for such year or (ii) adjusted gross income in excess of the amount at which the highest ordinary income tax bracket for trusts and estates begins for such year.

Footnotes

1 The statute carves out payments beneficially owned by any foreign government, international organization or foreign central bank, or others as determined by the Treasury.

2 A "passthru payment" is a broader concept than a "withholdable payment." It applies to "any withholdable payment or other payment attributable to a withholdable payment."

3 Unless this obligation is limited by regulations, the provision will cast an extremely wide net and may pick up foreign financial institutions that would not anticipate being obligated to enter into an agreement with the Treasury (for example, because the foreign financial institution neither has US account holders nor makes direct US investments). Many investors in non-US hedge funds and private equity funds are themselves investment related vehicles and therefore may be treated as foreign financial institutions by virtue of being engaged "primarily in the business of investing." If this is the case, unless exempted by the Treasury, each such investor will itself be required to enter into agreements with the Treasury, as described herein, to avoid 30% US withholding tax on any passthru payments from the non-US hedge funds and private equity funds in which they are invested.

4 This represents a helpful change from the original FATCA proposal since, under FATCA, a single recalcitrant account holder would have caused the foreign financial institution to be itself considered non-compliant with the terms of its agreement with the Treasury and to incur 30% US withholding tax on all withholdable payments (as opposed to the portion attributable to the recalcitrant account holder). Two points of note: First, a recalcitrant account holder need not be a US account holder since any account holder who fails to provide enough information for the foreign financial institution to verify that such holder is not a US account holder will be considered recalcitrant. Second, the concept of withholding on recalcitrant account holders raises complex apportionment issues that presumably will be addressed in regulations.

5 Both the HIRE Act and FATCA refer to the "business of investing" in stocks and securities. It appears this is intended to cover hedge funds and private equity funds; we note however that since, under the tax law, "investing" is not a "trade or business," the scope of this definition is not entirely clear, particularly as it relates to private equity funds (the activities of which are generally limited to investing).

6 For example, these rules apply in full to a foreign financial institution, even if that foreign financial institution has entered into a "qualified intermediary" agreement with the Treasury.

7 The statute carves out payments beneficially owned by any publicly traded corporation, foreign government, international organization or foreign central bank, or others as determined by the Treasury.

8 Prior to March 18, 2012, withholding tax on dividend equivalent payments on notional principal contracts applies if "(i) in connection with entering into such contract, any long party to the contract transfers the underlying security to any short party to the contract, (ii) in connection with the termination of such contract, any short party to the contract transfers the underlying security to any long party to the contract, (iii) the underlying security is not readily tradable on an established securities market, (iv) in connection with entering into such contract, the underlying security is posted as collateral by any short party to the contract with any long party to the contract, or (v) such contract is identified by the Secretary as a specified notional principal contract."

9 This transition rule represents a beneficial change from the original FATCA proposal since FATCA would have applied to payments on all notional principal contracts contingent upon, or determined by reference to, the payment of a dividend from sources within the US, unless excepted by the Treasury, and that were made on or after 90 days from enactment.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More