ARTICLE
27 February 2019

Second Circuit Upholds Dismissal Of U.S. Bank's Untimely Breach Of Contract And Indemnity Claims

O
Orrick

Contributor

Orrick logo
Orrick is a global law firm focused on serving the technology & innovation, energy & infrastructure and finance sectors. Founded over 150 years ago, Orrick has offices in 25+ markets worldwide. Financial Times selected Orrick as the Most Innovative Law Firm in North America for three years in a row.
On February 6, the Second Circuit affirmed a trial court order dismissing repurchase and indemnification claims brought by the Federal Housing Finance Agency.
United States Finance and Banking
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On February 6, the Second Circuit affirmed a trial court order dismissing repurchase and indemnification claims brought by the Federal Housing Finance Agency ("FHFA"), acting on behalf of U.S. Bank as Trustee, against GreenPoint Mortgage Funding Inc., predicated on allegations that mortgage loans sold by GreenPoint breached representations and warranties in the relevant loan purchase agreements.

First, the Second Circuit affirmed the district court's finding that the breach of contract claims were brought after the six-year statute of limitations expired, following the long line of New York cases holding (i) that a breach of contract cause of action accrues when the representations and warranties become effective; and (ii) that an express accrual clause cannot delay the statute of limitations under New York law.The Court also affirmed the district court's dismissal of U.S. Bank's indemnification claim, determining that it amounted to the mere repackaging of a breach of contract claim in an effort evade the applicable statute of limitations issue. Finally, the Court affirmed dismissal of another indemnification claim—first pressed when the Second Amended Consolidated Complaint was filed—that purportedly arose not from the representations and warranties or other trust documents, but from a separate set of "Indemnification Agreements." Because that claim did not arise from the same conduct or transaction at issue in the initial complaint, however, the Court reasoned that the relation-back doctrine did not apply, and the claim was also time-barred.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More