ARTICLE
4 October 2021

SEC Proposes Changes To How Funds Disclose How They Voted

PC
Perkins Coie LLP

Contributor

Perkins Coie is a premier international law firm with over a century of experience, dedicated to addressing the legal and business challenges of tomorrow. Renowned for its deep industry knowledge and client-centric approach, the firm has consistently partnered with trailblazing organizations, from aviation pioneers to artificial intelligence innovators. With 21 offices across the United States, Asia, and Europe, and a global network of partner firms, Perkins Coie provides seamless support to clients wherever they operate.

The firm's vision is to be the trusted advisor to the world’s most innovative companies, delivering strategic, high-value solutions critical to their success. Guided by a one-firm culture, Perkins Coie emphasizes excellence, collaboration, inclusion, innovation, and creativity. The firm is committed to building diverse teams, promoting equal access to justice, and upholding the rule of law, reflecting its core values and enduring dedication to clients, communities, and colleagues.

In the making for a long time, the SEC proposed rules yesterday that would change how mutual funds disclose their proxy voting – and would require institutional investors to disclose...
United States Corporate/Commercial Law

In the making for a long time, the SEC proposed rules yesterday that would change how mutual funds disclose their proxy voting – and would require institutional investors to disclose their say-on-pay voting records for the first time. Here's the 174-page proposing release.

It's been 18 years since the SEC first started requiring public disclosure of mutual fund voting – on Form N-PX – and many believe that changes have been long overdue. (There was a SEC proposal in 2010 that didn't go anywhere.) That's because the Form N-PXs can be difficult to parse – some are hundreds of pages long – even a thousand pages long – and in a format that is challenging to the lay reader.

Each fund can format their N-PX any way they choose under the SEC's existing rules. The reports also aren't machine readable, a “must” in today's world. It's a real scattershot framework that doesn't produce disclosure that can be readily consumed.

Here are six things to know about the SEC's proposal:

  1. More Uniformity for Agenda Item Descriptions – Funds would be required to use the same language to describe each voting matter as is used on the company's form of proxy – and to categorize each matter by category and subcategory.
  2. More Uniformity for How N-PX Is Organized – Funds would be required to organize their reports a certain way in order to make the disclosures easier to read and compare across funds.
  3. “Machine Learning” Enabled – Funds would be required to use a structured data language.
  4. Disclosure about Securities Lending Activities – Funds would be required to disclose how their securities lending activities impact voting. Some funds “loan” their holdings in a manner that allows others to vote their shares – this activity would be disclosed under this proposal.
  5. Institutional Investor Disclosure about “Say-on-Pay” Voting – Institutional investment managers, as defined by Section 13(f) of the Exchange Act, would be required to disclose how they voted on executive compensation, or “say-on-pay,” matters, something that funds already disclose in their N-PXs.
  6. Form N-PXs Still Due Annually by August 31st – Leading up to the proposal, there was speculation that the SEC would propose more frequent – or at least, a shorter – deadline for reporting. However, the SEC proposes to leave the August 31st annual deadline as it is.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More