ARTICLE
10 April 2025

UPC Infringement Action – DO NOT Delay Requesting Provisional Measures

B
Boult Wade Tennant

Contributor

Boult is a leading European IP patent, design and trade mark firm recognised throughout the IP world for its commercial awareness and commitment to clients. Our teams in our UK, German and Spanish offices handle work at a national, European regional and international level.
In the recent decision of the Brussels Local Division of the UPC (UPC_CFI_582/2024), the Court emphasized that if an applicant delays requesting provisional...
United Kingdom Intellectual Property

In the recent decision of the Brussels Local Division of the UPC (UPC_CFI_582/2024), the Court emphasized that if an applicant delays requesting provisional measures after obtaining all necessary information, this may indicate a lack of genuine interest in promptly enforcing rights. Such delays could render the request for provisional protection inappropriate.

The ruling stresses the need for patent holders to act quickly and provide adequate evidence to support their claims. The evidence gathering should start as soon as the patent holder becomes aware of the infringing act.

The decision also clarifies that:

  • the date of the European patent's grant is considered the critical date for filing an action with the UPC or an action for provisional measures (such as a preliminary injunction), not the date when the patent acquires unitary effect.
  • Rule 19.1(b) of the Rules of Procedure (RoP) regarding preliminary objections (related to the proceedings on the merits) is not applicable to objections concerning provisional measures, since these are addressed in a different procedural context. Provisional measures are typically granted with expedited proceedings to avoid the loss of rights or irreparable harm to the applicant.
  • if a party wishes to challenge the validity of the patent or jurisdiction, this will not automatically delay proceedings on the provisional measures.
  • cumulative conditions apply for granting provisional measures. That is, if one condition is not met, then this implies that the claim for provisional measures is unfounded without the need for the Court to assess any other condition. These conditions include, inter alia, demonstrating a prima facie case for validity and infringement, and that the balance of interests weighs in the applicant's favour.

The decision is a strong message from the UPC that provisional measures are designed to be a fast-track procedure, distinct from the full merits of the case.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More