ARTICLE
18 September 2012

Passing On Information

CC
Clyde & Co

Contributor

Clyde & Co  logo
Clyde & Co is a leading, sector-focused global law firm with 415 partners, 2200 legal professionals and 3800 staff in over 50 offices and associated offices on six continents. The firm specialises in the sectors that move, build and power our connected world and the insurance that underpins it, namely: transport, infrastructure, energy, trade & commodities and insurance. With a strong focus on developed and emerging markets, the firm is one of the fastest growing law firms in the world with ambitious plans for further growth.
This Statement is a guide to some of the constraints on an insolvency practitioner to pass on information.
UK Insolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

This Statement is a guide to some of the constraints on an insolvency practitioner to pass on information.

The different sources of information

As set out in Individual Account Statement IA004 and Corporate Account Statement CA003, insolvency office holders can obtain documents from a number of sources using various provisions in the Insolvency Act 1986 ("IA86"). The nature of the documents, how they were created, and the manner in which they were obtained, can affect the insolvency office-holder's rights to use those documents.

The insolvent entity's own information

If the office-holder collects the entity's books and records on appointment, he has a right to deal with that information in the same way as the person/company. He could therefore decide to release those documents to the world at large or keep them entirely confidential. This also means, however, that any duties of confidence that constrain the insolvent entity also apply to limit the office-holder's ability to use the information.

For instance, if the company had entered into a non-disclosure agreement with another business, then the office-holder will also be subject to the terms of that agreement. Similarly, if the bankrupt was a doctor, the trustee would still be bound by the duty of confidence to the patients and could not release their medical records to the public. To release documents subject to a duty of confidence the office-holder would need either the permission of the other party or an order of the court.

Information obtained without using the office-holder's powers

In most instances, if a third party freely gives information to the office-holder, he can use the information as he sees fit. In theory, this means he could release the information for spurious reasons, but the more cautious approach would only be to release the information if it furthers the interests of the estate.

However, an office-holder can voluntarily add a restriction that will bind him. So if, for instance, at the conclusion of a voluntary interview, the office-holder states that he will not release the transcript without the interviewee's permission, the transcript then becomes subject to that restriction.

Information obtained by the office-holder by using his powers

If the office-holder obtains documentation using his Insolvency Act powers, or the threat of such powers, there is an additional obligation to only use that information for the purpose for which it was obtained. This will usually mean using the information to increase realisations for the estate, but could also mean, for example, to assist the official receiver in his investigations. Careful consideration needs to be given if the potential recipient could also use the information in a manner contrary to the best interests of the estate; if in doubt a Court application should be made.

Section 236 & 366 IA86 interview transcripts

An office-holder cannot release a transcript of a 236/366 ordered interview, or a witness statement filed pursuant to a 236/366 order, without an order of the court (rule 9.5 of the Insolvency Rules 1986).

Legally privileged documents

An office-holder can release the insolvent entity's privilege in a document (but should only do so if it is in the best interests of the estate). However, neither the office-holder, nor the Court, can waive someone else's privilege (save in very limited circumstances).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More