ARTICLE
20 March 2015

Focus Antitrust - 20 March 2015

CR
Charles Russell Speechlys LLP

Contributor

We are an international law firm with a focus on private capital, at the intersection of personal, family and business. We have a broad range of skills and collective legal expertise and experience with an international outlook across the full spectrum of business and personal needs. Our firm is headquartered in London with offices across the UK, Europe, Asia and the Middle East. Whether your business operates in a single country or across borders, we’ll put together your perfect team – pulling from our sector and geographical expertise and our partnerships with the best law firms across the world covering 200 legal jurisdictions.

The General Court has upheld the European Commission's decision prohibiting the proposed merger between Deutsche Börse and NYSE Euronext, rejecting all the pleas put forward by Deutsche Börse.
United Kingdom Antitrust/Competition Law

IN THE NEWS

General Court confirms prohibition of Deutsche Börse/NYSE Euronext merger

The General Court has upheld the European Commission's decision prohibiting the proposed merger between Deutsche Börse and NYSE Euronext, rejecting all the pleas put forward by Deutsche Börse. 

In particular, the General Court considered that there was no basis for calling into question the Commission's conclusions on the definition of the relevant market, the efficiency gains associated with the merger or the commitments offered by the companies. Click here.

CMA issues preliminary invitation to comment in relation to the BT/EE merger

The CMA has issued a preliminary invitation to comment in relation to the anticipated acquisition by BT of EE, which is an early opportunity for interested third parties to make their views known on the transaction.  

The CMA has not yet commenced a formal investigation of the transaction. Click here

EU

Articles 101 and 102

  • The European Court of Justice has dismissed appeals by Versalis, Eni and the European Commission against the General Court's judgment in relation to the chloroprene rubber cartel case.  In particular, the ECJ held that the General Court had been right to uphold the Commission's finding that Eni and Versalis were liable for the infringements of their subsidiary companies. Click here

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More