ARTICLE
6 December 2021

Removal Of A Director By Shareholders Or The Board Of Directors

SI
SchoemanLaw Inc.

Contributor

SchoemanLaw Inc. logo
SchoemanLaw Inc Attorneys, Conveyancers and Notaries Public, based in Cape Town, is a boutique law firm offering its clients access to high quality online legal documents and agreements, together with a wide range of legal services. The firm has an innovative and entrepreneurial mind-set that distinguishes it from other law firms. We apply our first-hand understanding of the challenges facing entrepreneurs (regardless of their business size) to develop proven, practical solutions incorporating legal compliance, risk aversion and business sense. We achieve this by offering clients tailored, yet holistic support comprising of legal gap analysis, the construction of tailored legal solutions and the practical implementation thereof through training and automation.
Directors of a company must perform their duties in a manner that furthers the interests of both the company and the shareholders. So what happens when a director is encumbering the business...
South Africa Corporate/Commercial Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Directors of a company must perform their duties in a manner that furthers the interests of both the company and the shareholders. So what happens when a director is encumbering the business affairs of the company or acts in a manner that is contrary to the best interests of the Company? The Companies Act 71 of 2008 ("the Act") makes provision for the removal of directors in three manners, namely: removal by the shareholders; removal by the board of directors; and removal in accordance with the companies Memorandum of Incorporation. In this article, we will discuss the removal by shareholders and the board of directors.

Removal by Shareholders

The shareholders of a company appoint the director(s) and thus are also responsible for ensuring the correct processes are adhered to. Irrespective of what is contained in the MOI, any agreements between the director and the company, or between the directors and the shareholders, the shareholders may remove the director. Contrary to the removal by the board of directors, shareholders do not need to have a particular reason in order to remove a director. Section 71(1) of the Act provides for the removal of a director by ordinary resolution. Thus the removal need only be by majority vote. However, the shareholders must ensure procedural fairness and in accordance with Section 71(2) of the Act prior notice of the meeting must be given to the affected director so as to afford the affected director with the reasonable opportunity to make representations to the shareholders prior to the resolution being considered.

Removal by the Board of Directors

In accordance with section 71(3), removal by the board of directors may only be done if a shareholder or director alleges one of the following grounds:

The director has become ineligible or disqualified to act in terms of the Act;

The director has become incapacitated to the extent that they are unable to perform their functions and unlikely to regain capacity within a reasonable time; and

The director has neglected or been derelict in his or her functions.

Similarly, to the shareholders, the board of directors must ensure procedural fairness and must furnish the director with the notice to the proposed resolution. A statement must also be provided that indicates the grounds alleged for the removal. The director thus has the opportunity to make representations prior to the consideration of the removal.

Remedies available to the Director

A director who has been removed from their position remains entitled to make an application to court for damages or compensation due should they feel the removal by the shareholders or board of directors were procedurally unfair. Whilst the removal may be taken on review at a court, it is still unclear whether this can be done when the removal was by the shareholders, as the shareholders are entitled to do so by majority vote and should they wish to do so, rather than the director having met one of the alleged grounds. A removal by the board of directors may be taken on appeal to the court, should the affected director believe that the decision was unjust. Any claim that the affected director may have may also include the loss of their position as a director or the loss of any other position resulting from their removal as a director.

Conclusion

Similar to employee dismissal procedures, the removal of the director must be procedurally fair, and in the case of the board of directors, also substantively fair. It is important for companies and directors alike to know their rights in terms of the Act and to seek sound legal advice should they be unclear on any aspect. Whilst the company is entitled to remove its directors, directors have the right to apply to court in certain circumstances and should exercise this right should they believe they have a strong case to do so.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More