INTRODUCTION TO FOREIGN ARBITRAL AWARDS
Structured procedures are followed by parties in arbitration, much like in court action. A binding "award" is produced via arbitration to settle disagreements between the parties, much how courts issue rulings following a case hearing. Arbitral awards, particularly those rendered by foreign tribunals, are crucial to the settlement of international disputes. Both domestic and international commercial arbitration rules have been developed, updated, and adjusted to fit contemporary needs, significantly improving their efficacy and efficiency. This is done to secure the enforcement of foreign arbitral rulings and preserve international arbitration standards. "Foreign award" is defined in India under Section 44 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. In order to be designated as a "foreign arbitral award," a ruling had to come from arbitration hearings that took place outside of India. In the case of Michel Golodetz v. Serajuddin and Co.1, the Calcutta High Court emphasized the prerequisites for accepting foreign arbitration. If foreign parties are involved, the arbitration is held in a foreign nation by foreign arbitrators, and it is subject to foreign laws, it is considered foreign.
RECOGNITION VS. ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN ARBITRAL AWARDS
It's important to understand the differences between "recognition" and "enforcement" when talking about foreign arbitral rulings and their enforcement. "Recognition" plays a protective role by guaranteeing that arbitral rulings are recognized between the same parties, especially when comparable issues covered by the same convention are involved. In essence, a party may attempt to have an arbitral award recognized in order to refute or avert any further claims to arbitration pertaining to settled or resolved disputes. Conversely, "enforcement" is a proactive approach. In addition to requesting acknowledgment, the party seeking the award hopes to have it legally enforced, guaranteeing adherence by judicial actions that support and carry out the decision. In Brace Transport Corpn. of Monrovia v. Orient Middle East Lines Ltd.2 Justice SP Bharucha held - "Before we deal with the facts of the case before us, a statement of some broad principles is necessary. The New York Convention speaks of "recognition and enforcement" of an award. An award may be recognised, without being enforced; but if it is enforced, then it is necessarily recognised. Recognition alone may be asked for as a shield against re-agitation of issues with which the award deals. Where a court is asked to enforce an award, it must recognise not only the legal effect of the award but must use legal sanctions to ensure that it is carried out."
ENFORCEMENT OF THE FOREIGN ARBITRAL AWARDS
The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 established two frameworks that govern the enforcement of international arbitral rulings in India. While overseas arbitral awards are recognized and enforceable under the Geneva Convention (Chapter II of Part II) and the New York Convention (Chapter I of Part II), domestic awards are covered under section 36. These clauses ensure the recognition and execution of international awards, subject to the limitations and reciprocity specified in the pertinent agreements.
ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN ARBITRAL AWARDS UNDER THE NEW YORK CONVENTION
The New York Convention, which has been ratified by more than 160 nations—including India—is regulated by Sections 44 to 52 of Act I of Part II. According to Section 453, a judicial authority must refer a disagreement to arbitration at one party's request if the parties have agreed to resolve conflicts through arbitration. Under this article, courts have the authority to compel parties to arbitration, provided that the arbitration agreement is not deemed "null and void," "inoperative," or "incapable of being performed." Foreign arbitral awards enforceable under Chapter I of Part II of the Act are legally obligatory on the parties involved, as stipulated by Section 464. These awards may be used as a set-off, defense, or for other purposes in Indian court proceedings. Section 48 describes the situations in which a foreign arbitral ruling may not be enforced in India and the criteria under which such an award may not be enforced. A foreign arbitral award will be regarded as a court decree as soon as a court is convinced that it may be enforced, according to Section 49.
ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN ARBITRAL AWARDS UNDER THE GENEVA CONVENTION
Next, the Geneva Convention Awards under Chapter II of Part II govern the enforcement of the awards under sections 53 to 60 of the Act. The Geneva Convention on the Execution of Foreign Arbitral Awards applies to territories designated as "reciprocating" by the Central Government. The award must be issued in a territory recognized by the Central Government. Three crucial conditions are listed in Section 535 in order for foreign arbitral rulings to be enforceable. These requirements are as follows: the award must be based on an arbitration agreement governed by the Geneva Protocol on Arbitration Clauses, 1923; it must involve parties from territories designated as "reciprocating."
REQUIREMENTS FOR ENFORCING FOREIGN ARBITRAL AWARDS
According to Section 566, a party seeking the enforcement of a foreign arbitral award must provide the following: the original award or a duly authenticated copy; proof that the award is final; evidence that the award was issued by the tribunal designated in the agreement or as agreed by the parties; and, in the event that the award and/or agreement are in a foreign language, a certified English translation of the document. The conditions for implementing international arbitral awards under the Geneva Convention are outlined in Section 577. The following sequence is in which they are listed: The award must have been made by the arbitral tribunal specified in the arbitral agreement or selected by both parties, and it must be final in the country in which it was made; that is, there cannot be any ongoing appeals or challenges to the verdict. The award must have been made on the basis of an arbitration agreement valid under the applicable laws; the subject matter of the award must be one that can be resolved through arbitration under Indian law; Additionally, According to Indian law, the award's execution cannot go against "public policy."8
Grounds for Refusal of Enforcement OF FOREIGN ARBITRAL AWARDS
Section 489 lists the following reasons for not allowing the enforcement of a New York Convention Award: A party's incapacity; The arbitration agreement's invalidity; inadequate notification to a party; the decision addressing matters not brought up for arbitration; breach of the arbitration agreement; the decision is not legally enforceable. If an application to set aside or suspend the award is pending, the court may adjourn the decision and require security from the party seeking enforcement.10 In the case of Renusagar Power Co. Ltd. v. General Electric Co.11 it was held "the enforcement of a foreign arbitral award would be refused on the grounds of public policy if it is contrary to the (i) fundamental policy of Indian Law, (ii) the interests of India and (iii) justice or morality." A foreign arbitral award may not be enforced under certain circumstances, as stated in Section 57 of the Geneva Convention. These circumstances include prompt notification, adequate representation, disagreements over problems, and disagreements over judgments. According to Article 136 of the Geneva Convention Schedule under the Limitation Act, 1963, the award is enforceable with the legal standing of a decree, and the 12-year statute of limitations runs from the date of the decree.12
Conclusion
In conclusion, foreign arbitral awards must be enforced in order for international dispute resolution to be conducted in an organized and legally binding manner. The New York and Geneva Conventions provide the necessary structures for these awards to be recognized and upheld in India, according to global norms and fostering trust in international arbitration. The 1996 Arbitration and Conciliation Act defines the grounds for rejecting the arbitral process and public policy, as well as the enforcement procedures and makes a distinction between recognition and enforcement. Court rulings, like the one in Renusagar Power Co. Ltd. v. General Electric Co.13, illustrate the function of arbitration in resolving international disputes by showing how the Indian legal system strikes a balance between safeguards against abuse and efficient enforcement.
Footnotes
1. Michel Golodetz v. Serajuddin and Co., 1958 SCC OnLine Cal 87.
2. Brace Transport Corpn. of Monrovia v. Orient Middle East Lines Ltd., 1995 Supp (2) SCC 280.
3. The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, §45, Acts of Parliament, 1996 (India).
4. The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, §46, Acts of Parliament, 1996 (India).
5. The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, §53, Acts of Parliament, 1996 (India).
6. The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, §56, Acts of Parliament, 1996 (India).
7. The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, §57, Acts of Parliament, 1996 (India).
8. Deepanjali Jain and Prateek Khandelwal, The Doctrine of Public Policy: Backdoor Strategy to Review Foreign Arbitral Award or Necessary Evil, 1.1 CLCR (2023) 70.
9. The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, §48, Acts of Parliament, 1996 (India).
10. Benoit Le Bars and Tejas Shiroor, Provisional Measures in Investment Arbitration: Wading Through the Murky Waters of Enforcement, 6.1 IJAL (2017) 24
11. Renusagar Power Co. Ltd. v. General Electric Co., 1994 Supp (1) SCC 644.
12. Fuerst Day Lawson Ltd. v. Jindal Exports Ltd., (2001) 6 SCC 356.
13. Supra, note 4.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.