ARTICLE
19 August 2024

LD Duesseldorf, August 2, 2024, Procedural Order Concerning Application Tintelle"o Amend, UPC_CFI_355/2023

BP
Bardehle Pagenberg

Contributor

BARDEHLE PAGENBERG combines the expertise of attorneys-at-law and patent attorneys. As one of the largest IP firms in Europe, BARDEHLE PAGENBERG advises in all fields of Intellectual Property, including all procedures before the patent and trademark offices as well as litigation before the courts through all instances.
Admissibility of (later) applications for amendmentsinolve s
Germany Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

1. Key takeaways

Admissibility of (later) applications for amendments

Amended application for amendment is new application for amendment

Territorial limitation of an Application to Amend only to be considered if there are objective reasons therefor

2. Division

LD Duesseldorf

3. UPC number

UPC_CFI_355/2023

4. Type of proceedings

Infringement Proceedings

Counterclaim for Revocation

Application to Amend

5. Parties

Claimant: FUJIFILM Corporation

Defendants: Kodak GmbH, Kodak Graphic Communications GmbH, Kodak Holding GmbH

6. Patent(s)

EP 3 594 009

7. Body of legislation / Rules

Rule 30, 263 RoP, Art. 34 UPCA

To view the full article please click here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More