CD Munich, 23 July, 2023, Order On Conclusion Of A Revocation Action By Way Of Settlement, UPC 75/2023, UPC 80/2023

BP
Bardehle Pagenberg

Contributor

BARDEHLE PAGENBERG combines the expertise of attorneys-at-law and patent attorneys. As one of the largest IP firms in Europe, BARDEHLE PAGENBERG advises in all fields of Intellectual Property, including all procedures before the patent and trademark offices as well as litigation before the courts through all instances.
The parties may at any time conclude their action by way of settlement which "shall" be confirmed by a decision of the Court, Art. 79 UPCA. R. 365 RoP clarifies that the Court shall confirm the settlement only...
Germany Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

1. Key takeaways

Conclusion of an action by way of settlement without a request according to R. 365.1 RoP possible

The parties may at any time conclude their action by way of settlement which "shall" be confirmed by a decision of the Court, Art. 79 UPCA. R. 365 RoP clarifies that the Court shall confirm the settlement only if requested by the parties. This is in line with the principle of party disposition, Art. 76 (1) and 43 UPCA. Thus, the parties may at any time conclude their action by way of settlement, also without seeking a confirmatory Court decision according to R. 365.1 RoP.

Alternative options to conclude an action

The parties may agree that the plaintiff shall apply to withdraw the action (with the consent of the defendant) in accordance with R. 265 RoP. Or, as the parties did in this case, the parties can request unanimously that the court disposes of the action as it has become devoid of purpose and there is no longer any need to adjucate theron in accordance with R. 360 RoP.

Reimbursement of Court fees based on R. 370.9 is also possible if the Court did not confirm the settlement in the sense of R. 365

Rule 370.9 (reimbursement of 20% of the Court fees) is not limited to concluding an action by way of settlement within the meaning of R. 365 (Court confirmed settlement), since the rule only speaks of "settlement", makes no specific reference to R. 365 and since the parties shall be encouraged to settle an action in an early stage of the proceedings.

2. Division

Court of First Instance – Munich Central Division

3. UPC number

UPC 75/2023 CC_464985/2023 App_36628/2024,
UPC 80/2023 CC_465342/2023 App_36621/2024,
ORD_38648/2024

4. Type of proceedings

Revocation Action

5. Parties

Astellas Institue for Regenerative Medicine

Helios K.K.
Riken
Osaka University

6. Patent(s)

EP 3 056 563, EP 3 056 564

7. Body of legislation / Rules

Art. 43, 76(1) and 79 UPCA
R. 11.2, 265, 360, 365, 370.9 RoP

2024-07-23_UPC_75_2023_CD_Munich_Order
Download

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More