Canada And Ontario Breached Duty To Diligently Implement Treaty Promises

MA
MLT Aikins LLP

Contributor

MLT Aikins LLP is a full-service law firm of more than 300 lawyers with a deep commitment to Western Canada and an understanding of this market’s unique legal and business landscapes.
On Friday, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that Canada and Ontario dishonourably breached Treaty promises to the First Nation signatories to the Robinson Treaties of 1850. The Anishinaabe of the upper Great Lakes...
Canada Government, Public Sector
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On Friday, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that Canada and Ontario dishonourably breached Treaty promises to the First Nation signatories to the Robinson Treaties of 1850.

The Anishinaabe of the upper Great Lakes brought claims against Canada and Ontario to address those governments' longstanding failure to increase the annuities payments under the Robinson Treaties. The Robinson Treaties contain an "Augmentation Clause" which required the Crown to increase or decrease the annuities payments over time as the resource revenues from the land increased or decreased, subject to two conditions:

  1. The annuities would only be increased if the Crown could do so without incurring a loss.
  2. The total annuity would not exceed $4 dollars a year per person or "such further sum as Her Majesty may be graciously pleased to order."

The annuity was increased only once, in 1875, to $4 per person. The Supreme Court of Canada stated that capping the annuity payment at $4 per person could "only be described as a mockery of the Crown's treaty promise." The Court confirmed that that the Crown has a duty to diligently fulfill promises in Treaty and that for close to 150 years that duty has been breached.

The Court also concluded that the First Nations' claims were not barred by Ontario's Limitations Act.

Some of the plaintiffs settled their claims with Canada and Ontario before the Supreme Court of Canada's decision while others had not. The Court directed Canada and Ontario to negotiate meaningfully and honourably with the remaining plaintiffs to determine a fair amount of compensation. If the parties cannot reach a settlement within six months of the Court's decision then Canada and Ontario must exercise their discretion to determine the compensation amount, which will be subject to review by the Courts.

The Supreme Court of Canada's decision deals with issues regarding the application of Treaty interpretation principles to specific Treaty promises, the application of provincial limitation periods to claims for breach of Treaty, and the Crown's obligation to diligently implement Treaty promises.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More