ARTICLE
14 August 2024

CETESB Publishes New Board Decision On The Management Of Contaminated Areas

MB
Mayer Brown

Contributor

Mayer Brown is a distinctively global law firm, uniquely positioned to advise the world’s leading companies and financial institutions on their most complex deals and disputes. We have deep experience in high-stakes litigation and complex transactions across industry sectors, including our signature strength, the global financial services industry.
The Environmental Agency of the State of São Paulo (Companhia Ambiental do Estado de São Paulo - CETESB) recently published in the Official Gazette new guidelines...
Brazil Environment
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The Environmental Agency of the State of São Paulo (Companhia Ambiental do Estado de São Paulo - CETESB) recently published in the Official Gazette new guidelines for managing contaminated areas and the procedures for requesting technical opinions related to the execution of the management of contaminated areas.

This new board decision, No. 056/2024/E, is in line with State Law No. 13,577/2009 (which establishes guidelines and procedures for the protection of soil quality and the management of contaminated areas), State Decree No. 59,263/2013 (which regulates State Law No. 13,577/2009), and State Decree No. 62,973/2017 (which complements and amends provisions related to environmental management).

The process for managing contaminated areas is broken down into three categories of procedures—three “blocks” of stages—under Resolution No. 420/2009 of the National Environmental Council (Conselho Nacional do Meio Ambiente - CONAMA):

  1. Block 1 – the Identification: Preliminary Assessment and Confirmatory Investigation stages
  2. Block 2 – the Diagnosis: Detailed Investigation, Risk Assessment, and Preparation of the Intervention Plan stages
  3. Block 3 – the Intervention: Execution of the Intervention Plan and Monitoring for Closure stages

In the absence of suspected contamination, the process will end at Block 1, the preliminary assessment stage. If risks above acceptable levels are not identified, the process will end at Block 2, after a more detailed investigation and risk assessment; and in that case, Block 3 will include only the monitoring for the closure stage.

The new board decision establishes that the approval of each block will be granted by the issuance of a technical opinion. To request a technical opinion, the legal entity responsible for the management procedure must submit the results meeting the block's testing criteria to CETESB. Before submitting the results, the legal entity must complete all applicable stages. However, in cases involving risks to human life or to public health, certain emergency measures must be taken, as outlined in Article 19 of State Decree No. 59,263/2013.

The rules for the submission of reports and requests for technical opinions established in CETESB Board Decision No. 038/2017/C have been revoked by the board decision, except in relation to requests for technical opinions concerning a deactivation pan of enterprises and the results of the implementation and execution of intervention measures.

Visit us at mayerbrown.com

Mayer Brown is a global services provider comprising associated legal practices that are separate entities, including Mayer Brown LLP (Illinois, USA), Mayer Brown International LLP (England & Wales), Mayer Brown (a Hong Kong partnership) and Tauil & Chequer Advogados (a Brazilian law partnership) and non-legal service providers, which provide consultancy services (collectively, the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are established in various jurisdictions and may be a legal person or a partnership. PK Wong & Nair LLC ("PKWN") is the constituent Singapore law practice of our licensed joint law venture in Singapore, Mayer Brown PK Wong & Nair Pte. Ltd. Details of the individual Mayer Brown Practices and PKWN can be found in the Legal Notices section of our website. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of Mayer Brown.

© Copyright 2024. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More