Bermuda: Trust Protectors: Powers, Duties And Removal

Last Updated: 9 November 2016
Article by Nick Miles and Mark Chudleigh

Relationships between Protectors and other parties to a trust can occasionally deteriorate, resulting in in disputes focussing on the Protector's conduct, and calling for his or her replacement.

Two recent offshore judgments illustrate the types of disputes that can arise. In the representation of Jasmine Trustees Limited & another [2015] JRC 196 (Jersey)


In Jasmine Trustees Limited [2015] JRC 196, the Royal Court of Jersey provided clear guidance on the fiduciary duties owed by those charged with appointing and removing trustees and Protectors. This case related to two family trusts, the Piedmont Trust (P Trust) and the Riviera Trust (R Trust). There was a relationship breakdown between a father and his sons, on the one hand, and his daughter, following contentious U.S. litigation. The beneficiaries of the P Trust included the father, sons, daughter and their children. The father was the Protector of the P Trust and Jasmine Trustees Limited (Jasmine) was the trustee. The beneficiaries of the R Trust were the same as the P Trust, but with two additional adult beneficiaries. The father was the Protector and both Jasmine and Lutea Trustees Limited (Lutea) were the trustees.

The father exercised his purported powers as Protector to:

  • Remove Jasmine and Lutea as trustees and appoint another firm (Kairos) in their place (despite there being unanswered questions and a lack of consensus among beneficiaries regarding Kairos).
  • Retire as Protector of the R Trust and P Trust and appoint his sons in his place.

In the event of a Protector's retirement, the P Trust deed required a majority of adult beneficiaries to appoint a replacement. All beneficiaries except the daughter consented to the sons' appointments.

Jasmine and Lutea challenged the validity of the appointment of Kairos, while the daughter sought a decla­ration that the appointment of the sons as Protectors was invalid due to their conflict of interest and past behaviour.


The Jersey Court referred to the Cayman Islands Grand Court decision of Re The Circle Trust [2006] CILR 323 and agreed that the power to appoint a Protector or a trustee is a fiduciary one, even when vested in someone other than a trustee (such as a Protector or even a beneficiary, as in this case)1. The court then set out a non-exhaustive list of prin­ciples for fiduciaries when appointing trustees and Protectors:

  • To act in good faith and in the interests of the beneficiaries.
  • To act as a reasonable appointer would.
  • Not to act for a ulterior purpose.
  • To only take into account relevant matters.

The court was careful to note that its powers were only super­visory in nature and that it would not overturn decisions simply because it would have decided otherwise. However, the court found that there were cases where a decision was so unreasonable that the court should intervene.

The court decided that the father's pronouncements as Protector had been invalid for unreasonableness. With respect to the appointment of the new trustee, the court agreed with Jasmine and Lutea that the father had failed to establish that Kairos had the relevant expertise and financial standing. The court, and the parties, agreed that the father's purported removal of Jasmine and Lutea was so closely linked to the appointment of Kairos that they could not be separated. Ultimately, the court ordered that neither Jasmine, Lutea nor Kairos should be trustees and that another, untainted firm should be appointed.

As to the appointment of the sons as Protectors, the court was careful to indicate that it would not normally have intervened with the appointment. There was no inherent problem with the potential conflict of interest in having the brothers act as both Protectors and beneficiaries (and, in fact, the settlor of the trust had initially contemplated the father being both Protector and beneficiary). Further, it was found that the P Trust deed contemplated that the father's children would succeed him as Protector anyway, despite them being beneficiaries too.

However, the court ultimately agreed with the daughter that her brothers were unlikely to act in her best interests. In particular, their conduct in the context of the U.S. liti­gation evidenced their willingness to act contrary to their fiduciary obligations, and because they had historically displayed a willingness to always follow their father's word. Further, the appointment would be detrimental to the trust because the daughter would surely challenge any of the sons' decisions on the ground of conflict of interest, thereby making the trust unworkable. In the matter of the K Trust (Guernsey Judgment 31/2015)


In Re K Trust (Guernsey Judgment 31/2015, Unreported, July 2015), the relationship between the beneficiaries (including the settlor's widow) and the Protector (a close friend of the settlor) deteriorated when the Protector attempted to take an overly proactive approach following the retirement of the original trustee. Despite the insistence of the 14 adult beneficiaries, the Protector refused to stand down without a suitable replacement of her choosing. She further sought a blanket indemnity from the trust for any past liability arising from her actions as Protector, a matter regarding which the trust deed was silent. The trustee agreed with the beneficiaries that the trust was unworkable without a new Protector and so the beneficiaries applied to the Royal Court of Guernsey to remove the Protector.


In the absence of Guernsey authority on the matter, the court looked to other jurisdictions, such as the Jersey case of In the matter of the A Trust [2012] JRC169A, where it was held that the guiding principles for removing Protectors are akin to those applicable to the removal a trustee. The broad principle is that primacy must be given to the welfare of the beneficiaries and to the proper administration of the trust.

In this case, the court held that the Protector was not protecting the interests of the beneficiaries, her contin­uance would have been detrimental to the trust, and she was ordered to relinquish her position. In particular, the court noted how the Protector had taken on a role more akin to that of a trustee, including attending meetings with her own advisors and examining the trustee's actions 'with a fine-toothed comb'. Further, the trustee was actually refraining from acting in the hopes that the Protector would retire. Ultimately, the court accepted that a 'stalemate' had arisen without any prospect of improvement, making the trust unworkable. However, the court was careful to note that mere hostility and animosity are not, alone, sufficient to found a removal of a Protector.

The court held that the Protector's right to indemnity from the trust, in the absence of a term in the trust deed, depended on whether she acted in a fiduciary capacity. This is because persons, including third parties, acting as fiduciaries to a trust, have an implied equitable right to indemnity for expenses incurred in the discharge of their duties. Where a Protector provides a degree of oversight over the trust, their powers will be fiduciary rather than personal. In this case, the court declined to make any order to indemnify the Protector because such a blanket indemnity would be too wide. Rather, the court held that indemnities granted to third parties should be considered on a case-by-case basis having regard to the circumstances at the relevant time.


These recent judgments demonstrate that the powers exercised by Protectors (or beneficiaries) when removing trustees are fiduciary in nature, and attract fiduciary duties. They reveal the general principles that apply to the removal and appointment of Protectors and trustees, and to fiduciary powers generally. Those appointing trustees and Protectors must be cognisant of their duties and of the fiduciary capacity in which they are acting, and must not overstep their powers lest the trust relationship becomes unworkable. Similarly, beneficiaries must understand their powers, and their limitations, with respect to disputes involving Protectors and trustees.


1 This is consistent with the Bermuda Supreme Court's judgment in Von Knierem v BTC [1994] Bda LR 50.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.