European Union: EU Cartel And Horizontal Developments Over The Summer

Last Updated: 7 September 2016
Article by Martin Favart

In the following sections, we provide first a factual overview of the significant case developments at EU level, and thereafter a detailed analysis of important substantive or procedural developments addressed in these cases.

1.1 Summary of Significant Case Developments

Court of Justice provides guidance to Latvian Supreme Court on when a company can be held liable for an independent service provider's anticompetitive behaviour

On 21 July 2016, the Court of Justice ("ECJ") handed down its judgment in the VM Remonts case (Case C-542/14, VM Remonts and Others). The case concerned a bid-rigging cartel, in which three food suppliers had been fined by the Latvian Competition Council for colluding on prices offered in tenders for the supply of food to kindergartens. The three companies had made use of the same legal advisers, which had coordinated the prices in the respective offers. All three companies were found guilty of engaging in an illegal concerted practice.

On appeal, the Regional Court annulled the decision against one of the companies, on the ground that this company had not authorised, or been aware of, the conduct of the legal advisers. The Latvian Competition Council then brought an appeal against this judgment before the Latvian Supreme Court, which in turn referred questions to the ECJ. Specifically, the Supreme Court asked the ECJ whether a company must have been aware of, or consented to, the conduct of an external service provider, in order to be found guilty of anti-competitive conduct engaged in by the latter. In its judgment, the ECJ listed cases in which a company can be held liable for the conduct of an external service provider. This is addressed further below under 'Analysis of Important Substantive and Procedural Developments'.

Advocate General recommends rejecting appeal by Timab Industries against General Court's judgment in Animal Feed Phosphates cartel case

On 28 July 2016, Advocate General Henrik Saugmandsgaard issued his opinion in the appeal brought by Timab Industries ("Timab") before the Court of Justice ("ECJ") against the General Court's ("GC") judgment in the Animal Feed Phosphates cartel case (Case C-411/15 P, Timab Industries). The Advocate General recommends that the ECJ reject the appeal which challenges the legality of the underlying Commission decision (this decision was upheld by the General Court; see VBB on Competition Law, Volume 2015, No. 5, available at www.vbb.com). The Advocate General considers that the Commission did not infringe the principles on the protection of legitimate expectations and equal treatment in setting the amount of the fine imposed on Timab higher than the fine the Commission had proposed during the settlement procedure. The Advocate General shares the position of the General Court that the Commission applied the same methodology for the calculation of the range of fines in the settlement procedure as the methodology for the calculation of the fine imposed in the standard procedure.

Court of Justice dismisses appeal in Pre-stressing Steel cartel case

On 7 July 2016, the Court of Justice dismissed in its entirety the appeal lodged by Dutch steelmaker, HIT Groep (Case C-514/15 P, HIT Groep v Commission). The company had challenged the General Court judgment which upheld the Commission decision on price-fixing and marketing-sharing in the Pre-stressing Steel cartel case (see VBB on Competition Law, Volume 2015, No. 7, available at www.vbb.com). In that case, HIT Groep had been fined € 6.93 million for its participation in the cartel.

1.2 Analysis of Important Substantive and Procedural Developments

VM Remonts case: Court of Justice clarifies when an undertaking can be held liable for the anticompetitive behaviour of an independent service provider

In VM Remonts, the Court of Justice first reiterated the established case-law on the liability of an undertaking for the conduct of an independent service provider: an undertaking may be held liable if the service provider acts under the direction or control of the undertaking concerned, and is therefore considered part of the same economic unit of that undertaking. This is, for example, the case when the service provider has little or no autonomy or flexibility in the way he carries out his activities. The direction or control may also be inferred from specific legal or economic links with the undertaking concerned, similar to the relationship between a parent and its subsidiaries. In those situations, the service provider is not considered to be genuinely independent.

The ECJ also clarified the cases in which a company can be held liable for the conduct of a genuinely independent service provider. First, the anticompetitive behaviour of a genuinely independent service provider may be attributed to an undertaking making use of that service provider's services if the undertaking was aware of the anticompetitive objectives pursued by the service provider and the undertaking's competitors and intended to contribute by its own conduct to those objectives. This is, for example, the case when an undertaking intends to disclose commercially sensitive information to its competitors via a service provider with the aim of colluding on tender prices. This is also the case if the company expressly or tacitly consents to the anticompetitive behaviour of the service provider.

Second, the anticompetitive conduct of a genuinely independent service provider may be attributed to the undertaking making use of the services of that service provider if the undertaking could have "reasonably foreseen" the anticompetitive acts of the service provider and of the undertaking's competitors, and was prepared to accept the risks associated with those acts. In other words, it is not required that the undertaking intended to use the service provider to collude with its competitors, or that the undertaking was even aware of those practices. According to the ECJ, reasonable foreseeability of such anti-competitive behaviour is sufficient.

Interestingly, the ECJ did not follow Advocate General Wathelet's opinion. The Advocate General had suggested the introduction of a new form of rebuttable presumption for liability for competition law infringements committed by service providers (see VBB on Competition Law, Volume 2015, No. 12, available at www.vbb.com). With its condition of "reasonable foreseeability", the ECJ did not go so far as introducing a form of presumption of liability. A lot will, however, depend on how courts and competition authorities will interpret "reasonable foreseeability" and a broad interpretation will likely result in a low threshold for liability.

Animal Feed Phosphates cartel case: Advocate General's View on Hybrid Cartel Settlement

Hybrid settlements arise when one or more parties withdraw from a settlement procedure and the Commission decides to continue the case against these parties under the standard procedure. Because of the dual track, hybrid settlements raise questions on impartiality, objectivity, independence, equal treatment and legitimate expectations in the standard procedure.

The issues of equal treatment and legitimate expectations were, amongst others, examined by the General Court ("GC") in the Timab judgment (see VBB on Competition Law, Volume 2015, No. 5, available at www.vbb.com). Timab had argued that it had been punished by the Commission, in violation of Timab's rights of defence, for having discontinued the settlement procedure as the fine imposed on Timab had been substantially higher than the fine range considered by the Commission during the settlement procedure. The GC rejected Timab's application for annulment. The GC ruled that the Commission had correctly applied the 2006 Fining Guidelines and that the large discrepancy in the fine was the result of a change in the duration of the infringement applicable to Timab. This was the first time the GC had to rule on a hybrid cartel case and on the interplay between the standard procedure and the settlement procedure.

Timab appealed the GC's judgment before the ECJ. In its opinion of 28 July 2016, the Advocate General agreed fully with the GC's judgment and recommended rejection of Timab's appeal.

Pre-stressing steel cartel case: Commission refers to business year with normal economic activity

Under Article 23(2) of the Regulation on the Implementation of the Rules on Competition, a fine imposed for competition law infringements should not exceed 10 percent of the undertaking's total turnover in the business year preceding the decision in which the Commission imposes the fine.

In the Pre-stressing Steel case, the Commission issued its decision against HIT Groep in 2010.  However, the Commission did not use 2009 as the reference year for applying the 10 percent threshold because HIT Groep had restructured its operational activities in 2004, following which its turnover was limited. The Commission therefore determined the fine imposed on HIT Groep on the basis of its last normal business year in 2003.

On appeal before the Court of Justice ("ECJ"), HIT Groep argued that, by referring to 2003 instead of 2009, the fine had been calculated on the basis of an incorrect business year and thereby had contravened Article 23(2) of Regulation 1/2003. The company also argued that the case-law, which provides for a derogation from this rule in exceptional cases, could not be applied retroactively.

The ECJ upheld the General Court's judgment in its entirety. It held that, for the purpose of calculating the fine, the Commission is entitled to refer to the last business year that corresponds to a full year of normal activity as this reflects the actual economic situation of the undertaking concerned. By choosing a year which reflects normal economic activity, the deterrent effect of the fine is assured.

The ECJ added that the principle of legal certainty had not been infringed by applying case-law retroactively. The Court reasoned that Article 23(2) of Regulation 1/2003 does not impose a binding requirement on the Commission to use the immediately preceding business year.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions