Kazakhstan: CASE STUDY: Compensation For Environmental Damage As A Result Of Production Of Commonly Occurring Mineral Resources

Last Updated: 11 August 2016
Article by Sofiya Zhylkaidarova and Talgat Sariev

Dear colleagues, in this newsletter we would like to share an interesting experience that occurred in our recent litigation practice. At first glance, the quite common dispute regarding compensation for environmental damage has some aspects that are interesting from a practical point of view. For example, determining the person responsible for compensation for damage; resolution of the issue of liability for the actions of third parties; and finally, the correct calculation of environmental damage. This publication should be regarded solely as a description of a particular case from the point of view of a party in the dispute. Therefore, this coverage does not purport to be an objective and comprehensive analysis. We hope that the information about the existing court practice will be helpful should similar disputes arise, and will help to resolve disputes in a positive manner.

Thus, here is a brief introduction. Our client's program of deposit infrastructure development provides for the construction of oil platforms and access roads to them. In order to carry out the construction, the subsoil user engaged contractors.

The work included subgrade flooring and subsequent soil compaction and graveling. The project documentation stipulated the use of either imported soil, or "local" soil from side thrusts for compaction of the subgrade. During construction, the roughness of relief was leveled (uplands were dismantled and lowlands were covered, including via the use of soil left from the dismantlement of uplands).

Based on the results of a survey of the subsoil user's activities, the Ecology Department (ED) filed a claim against the subsoil user for compensation for damages to the environment as a result of unauthorized production of COMR in 2012–2014 in the amount of 3.9 bln. tenge.

Claimant's position

The ED reasoned their position as follows:

(1) Contractors used "local" soil for work—i.e., they carried out production of COMR without a permit. Because the use of soil involved removing soil from side thrusts, the ED considers such use as production of minerals.

In accordance with Article 35 of the Law "On Subsoil and Subsoil Use," the subsoil use right for exploration or production of COMR is performed via conclusion of a contract with the local executive body. Thus, by permits, the ED implies the contracts for production of COMR.

At that, the ED provided no references to the legislation that would have proved that (1) the use of soil involved production of COMR, and (2) the soil is COMR.

(2) The ED does not deny that the alleged violation of the law, resulting in damage to the environment, was made not by the subsoil user himself but by his contractors. Nevertheless, the ED concludes as follows: production of COMR was carried out by contractors in the contract territory of the subsoil user with the knowledge of the subsoil user, and COMR was intended to meet the needs of the subsoil user. Accordingly, the ED believes that the subsoil user is responsible for the production of COMR by his contractors. In that regard, the ED does not provide any reference to the law.

(3) As a result of unauthorized production of COMR, damage to the environment was caused. According to Article 10, paragraph 1, of the Law "On Subsoil and Subsoil Use," subsoil and minerals contained therein are state owned. In accordance with Article 321 of the Environmental Code, damage caused to the environment and the state due to unauthorized and irrational use of natural resources is subject to compensation. Due to the fact that the subsoil user's contractors carried out unauthorized production of COMR, the state suffered damage.

In accordance with Article 108 of the Environmental Code, economic assessment of the damage caused by illegal use of subsoil is determined in accordance with the Rules of economic assessment of damage caused by environmental pollution (approved by the Resolution of the Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan №535 dated 27 June 2007).

In accordance with paragraph 16 of the above-mentioned Rules, economic assessment of the damage caused by unauthorized production of COMR is defined as tenfold of the value of produced COMR. The cost of produced COMR is defined based on the average market price for implementation of the commercial product for a period not exceeding a quarter, starting from the date of the detection of violation.

Subsoil User's position

The subsoil user provided the following statements:

(1) The damage is compensated by a person causing such damage. The ED does not deny the fact that the subsoil user did not directly carry out the removal of soil, and all activities that the ED is considering illegal use of subsoil were carried out by third parties.

(2) The subsoil user is not liable for actions of third parties on their contract area unless those actions are related to subsoil use operations of such subsoil user.

(3) Soil is not COMR. Accordingly, (1) the fact of illegal use of subsoil is absent; (2) contractors' use (removal) of soil cannot be regarded as COMR production; and (3) the ED was not entitled to calculate damages on the basis of soil price.

Findings of the Court

Who is liable for the damage?

The court ruled that the environmental legislation permits assignment of compensation for damages only to the person who caused such damage as a result of environmental offense. At that, the court reasonably referred to

(1) Article 917 of the Civil Code, according to which the damage caused by unlawful actions shall be compensated by the person who caused such damage.

(2) Article 321 of the Environmental Code, according to which the perpetrators of environmental offenses are obliged to compensate the damage caused by them.

The Court indicated that the subsoil user may not be responsible for alleged damage, as the subsoil user did not commit acts that caused damage to the environment.

We believe that in this case the court correctly applied the substantive law, establishing assignment of responsibility for the damage to the person whose illegal actions caused such damage.

Noteworthy is the position of the prosecutor involved in the case. Thus, the prosecutor stated that the contractors should be considered as employees of the subsoil user. Consequently, the subsoil user, as an employer, should be held responsible in accordance with Article 921 of the Civil Code. The Court rightly indicated that Article 921 of the Civil Code is not applicable in this case, as this Article gives a clear definition of "employees", which covers only citizens (individuals).

Thus, the court found no grounds for bringing the subsoil user to responsibility for alleged illegal use of subsoil.

Responsibility of the subsoil user for actions of third parties in the contract territory

The court resolved that removal of soil by third parties in the contract territory of the subsoil user does not serve as grounds for bringing the subsoil user to material liability.

At that, the court indicated that in accordance with Article 1 paragraph 39 of the Law "On Subsoil and Subsoil Use", the contract area is the territory defined by the mining allotment, where the subsoil user has the right to carry out operations on subsoil use in accordance with the contract. Consequently, the subsoil user is responsible only for the activity related to subsoil use operations, stipulated by the contract. Therefore, the court finds that the subsoil user shall not be held responsible for the actions of other subsoil users in his contract territory.

The court indicated that guilt is the grounds for bringing to material liability for causing harm to environment. Due to the fact that the ED has not proved that the subsoil user committed a wrongful act which caused damage to the environment, the guilt of the subsoil user has also not been proven.

The court also took into account that, in accordance with civil legal contracts between the subsoil user and contractors, it is established that contractors shall be held responsible for obtaining any permits.

Thus, the court ruled that the subsoil user is not responsible for the actions of third parties in the contract territory, unless such actions are related to subsoil use operations of such subsoil user.

Could soil be considered COMR?

The court resolved that soil is not COMR. The court justified its finding as follows.

In accordance with Article 16 paragraph 8 of the Law "On Subsoil and Subsoil Use", the list of COMR is determined by the Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan. In the surveyed period (2012-2014) List of common mineral resources, approved by Decree of the Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan №397 dated 7 April 2011, was active. This list of COMR is exhaustive and does not contain such type of COMR as soil. Thus, the ED, while imputing illegal production of COMR, did not prove what kind of COMR was produced and in what amount.

The court further indicated that economic assessment of environmental damage caused by unauthorized production of COMR is defined tenfold of the value of produced COMR. Therefore, addressing the ED for assessment of the damage to soil price directly contradicts the requirements of legislation. The court reasonably rejected the arguments of the ED that soil is a composite of COMR.

It should be noted that some bylaws also do not refer soil to COMR. Thus, in accordance with Construction Rules of the RK 1.02-19-2007 "Earth building materials prospecting. General rules of work", soil (including soil from construction cavities and concentrated dump banks occurred during construction) refers to soil building materials, which in contrast to local building materials do not contain COMR. Soil building materials also cover coarse, sandy, clay and rocky soils that do not contain minerals in industrial conditions.

It should be noted that previously the courts of the Republic of Kazakhstan gave a similar assessment concerning reference of soil to COMR (e.g., in case of lawsuit of Atyrau region Department of Ecology to "Atyrauinzhdorstroy" LLP).

Could removal of soil be considered mineral production?

Unfortunately, the court did not provide univocal assessment of this issue. Nevertheless, in our opinion, the court indirectly confirmed that removal of soil cannot be equated with production of COMR.

Firstly, whereas soil is not mineral, its removal cannot be regarded as production. In accordance with the Law "On Subsoil and Subsoil Use", production refers to a whole range of works (operations) connected with extraction of minerals from subsoil to surface. Consequently, the object of production covers only minerals.

Secondly, the above-mentioned Construction Rules of the RK 1.02-19-2007 indicated that earth building materials prospecting should not be subject to the requirements which govern exploration, development, calculation and assertion of mineral deposits reserves.

It is possible that in this case, the use of soil should be considered as construction activities, and to some extent as land-use activities, as opposed to subsoil use operations.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions